I found a site that makes me ill

---

I agree 100% it is all so long and boring, that post is no exception. Thats why it takes me so long to research it when I make these posts. and that is why I put the dont read this long drawn out bastard unless your really into this stuff disclaimer at the top of my post. Once in a while I can really get into it, ut more often thennot its hard for me to concentrate on it and dig throu it all to find what Im after. I think its a rule that all religion material is to be this way

2. God has goddess wives. "This doctrine that there is a Mother in Heaven was affirmed in all plainness by the First Presidency of the Church" (Bruce R. McConkie, Apostle, Mormon Doctrine, p. 516).THE BIBLE TEACHES2. There is absolutely no mention of any wives of God. There will be no marrying in heaven (see Matthew 22:29,30)Yes that is correct God does have wives, and there is no marrage AFTER the resurection. Because after is judgement day and such. I dont see what the conflict in that qoute is?>3. God is limited by a physical body. "The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man's" (D&C, 130:22). "If God possesses a form, that form is of necessity of definite proportions, and therefore of limited extension and space. It is impossible for Him to occupy at one time more than one space of such limits" (James E. Talmage, Articles of Faith, p.43).THE BIBLE TEACHES3. The one true God is infinite. Any other "god" is a false god (see 2 Chronicles 6:18; Psalm 139:4-8; Jeremiah 23:24).This one made even less sense to me after reading the refferances. Probrably because I am tired. I cant understand what its trying to say really.>5. Jesus and Satan are brothers. "The appointment of Jesus to be the Savior of the world was contested by one of the other sons of God--Lucifer. This spirit-brother of Jesus desperately tried to become the Savior of mankind" (Milton R. Hunter, First Council of Seventy, The Gospel Through the Ages, p. 15).THE BIBLE TEACHES5. The real Jesus is the only begotten Son of God. He is God's son (John 1:1-14). Satan was a created angel--not a son of God (Isaiah 14:12). Jesus created all things, and in Him the fullness of God dwells! (see Colosians 1:15-20; Philippians 2:5-11; Hebrews 1:1-13).where are you getting these from? When I look up the scripture it doesnt say anything about what they are saying it says. Jhn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Jhn 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. Jhn 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. Jhn 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. Jhn 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. Jhn 1:6 There was a man sent from God, whose name [was] John. Jhn 1:7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all [men] through him might believe. Jhn 1:8 He was not that Light, but [was sent] to bear witness of that Light. Jhn 1:9 [That] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. Jhn 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. Jhn 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. Jhn 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: Jhn 1:13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Jhn 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. >The real Jesus is the only begotten Son of God. He is God's son (John 1:1-14). It doesnt say anything about that there if anything it says he has multiple children:Jhn 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: Note: Sons, sons is a plural. Meaning he had multiple sons. I cant be arsed to check out all these referances because most of them are wrong.I cant be bothered to read all these qoutes, as some of the qoutes are wrong and i cant be arsed to sift thru as im tired after college and stuff. I can send you a bunch of stuff that almost proves its true to an extent and you can give me your opinion on that.A painting on rock dug up in north america that they think was painted in AD 1200 and discovered in mexico (1925) shows white people doing work for black people being basic slaves. Now when early explorers discovered america there where no whites. And in the book of morman it talks about the laminites and nepites one tribe black and one white who fought and the laminites (dark skin tribe) wiped out the light skined tribe (nephites) there is a bunch of other stuff that points to the book of morman not being made up. I meen how could he have knowen that? That picture was dug up in 1925 in mexico. Theres more stuff but I am so tired after college I cant type or read anymore stuff.

>2. God has goddess wives. "This doctrine that there is a Mother in Heaven was affirmed in all plainness by the First Presidency of the Church" (Bruce R. McConkie, Apostle, Mormon Doctrine, p. 516).
THE BIBLE TEACHES
2. There is absolutely no mention of any wives of God. There will be no marrying in heaven (see Matthew 22:29,30)

Yes that is correct God does have wives, and there is no marrage AFTER the resurection. Because after is judgement day and such. I dont see what the conflict in that qoute is?

right off you should see it!
There is absolutely no mention of any wives of God, thats direct conflict for saying that he does

if your too tired to see the conflict then you bbest goto bed and reread this when youv ha sleep. its a forum, we can discuss this shit anytime the participants are alert enough to do so and got the time, no hurry on sorting out teh worlds problems in god or no god.

right off you should see it! There is absolutely no mention of any wives of God, thats direct conflict for saying that he doesIt doesnt say god has no wives it just doesnt talk about wives I wouldnt call that a direct conflict. I still wanna know your opinion on that painting on a rock or whatever it was. I have more storys like this that point to it being pretty likly. I got a lot of stuff to reply to in that big long mpost but I will try and get thru them all. But a few I had read didnt make sense since the actual bible referance didnt have much to do with what they were talking about.

Ok I wrote up a HUGE reply to this answering another 10 of them. But my IE crashed and as I had all the tabs in one IE window everything crashed. So I am not writing all that again. Basicaly the answer to them is that its either bad interperatation or has nothing to even do with the claim its making. The Jesus wedding thing was the guys personaly guess as there is a theory about it being jesus's wedding that even non morman people ponder over.But anyway I read most of it and it was all badly interperated and taken out of context. Such petty stuff like:And jebus did go and eat the mighty pickle sandwich of gallalee and he said it was good.And then the bible would say somthing like:Jesus's favorite sandwich was ham and he ate it lots.And then all of a sudden its like AH HA contradiction jesus likes ham and wasnt eating it OMFG!!!!!! Please could you give me the one biggest contradiction you can to do with the morman religion. Somthing that is definatly not personal interperatation or shit taken out of context or personal opinion because most of that stuff was a bit poor to be fair (no offence)