205'7"8"
-
Height and penis length relation
-
5'98.517 since febuary
-
5'7"4.5 in. when erect13 y.o.am i the youngest person on this board?
-
height 5"9'
penis 8'
age 14 -
6'3" tall7.5" dick13 feet (UK)
-
I seriously doubt there's any relation with height.I'm 15, 5 feet-5 inches tall, and my dicks 6 inches when hard. Im shorter(in height) than most people on here, but their dicks are about 5.5 inches when hard, so I'de say if there was any relation, it would be that tall people have short dicks.
-
5'9
6.75
15 -
5.5' tall7.0" long14.5 years old
-
5'10"15 years old6.75" long6.25" around is this average??
-
No, that's bigger than average, especially in thickness.
-
6'1"7.75 in. long6 in. around14 years oldis this average for an adult?is it average for someone my age?
-
First you said:i am 14 years old and my penis is 7.75 in. erect and 5.5 in. in girthis this small for my age?is it average?i dont know what to think.And I told you you were way above average. Why are you asking again?
-
5.10 feet tall 15 yr old 6.5 long 6.o girth
-
5' 8" Height26 yrs old7.25" length 5.25" girth
-
5'8.5 height16 years old8.5 legth on a really good day may be 9not sure about thickness but I know im not thick for my length...o yea and race...well im a uber mix...mexican/black/indian/american indain/jewish/egytain/irishplus a few other things
-
178.25 inches5'11
-
5'7" 6.22 24
-
a chick... 5'2"but is there really a relation....
-
6' 1''about 4.5in16 years old...hopefully it will grow bigger, it should lol
-
In response to: In reply to: HOWEVER there IS shown to be a race correlation This is not entirely true. There have been about half a dozen famous studies on this subject and they disagree on whether or not there is a correlation. Some say there is, some say there isn't. To be honest, the numbers of men involved in each of these studies is too small to make any real statement, with the largest being only about 36000 men.The largest body of evidence comes from a study carried out under the auspices of the WHO from the early 1970s until the early 1990s (results were published in 1992/1993 I believe but I can't find a reference on the web so I may not have that exactly right) and was not actually about the size of the penis; that was just an incidental measurement.The measurement that cropped up most often, as the final result, in these studies was 5.7 inches. The WHO report specifically stated that although they found a gigantic number of men across Africa who did have bigger than average penises (I think 1" of average was the boundary), they also found a very large number whose penises were smaller than average (again, I think 1" was used as the boundary), both groups only made up about 8.5% of the total number of men examined across Africa and similar statistical deviations were found across Europe, Asia, Australasia and the Americas. They did state that overall, there was a total difference of between 0.1" and 0.4" across the races with blacks at the top and orientals at the bottom.However, even given the fact that the WHO study reported on 4m men across more than 100 countries (and 4m women as well), it still cannot be said that this is truly representational of the (approximately) 3bn males on planet earth.The simple fact is nobody knows for certain (or if they do they haven't published the information) but anywhere between 5.5" and 6.5" would seem to be 'normal' (God, how I hate that word!)