Uncut sex

---

Thank you Amz for reminding me that this forum is not a medium for advertising. I'll try to refrain as best I can. But this thread began with the book SANII and most of the cited links refer back to it, or its summarization in the British Journal of Urology.This tread's topic is "uncut sex." Since SANII the first book, and the only book, to detail the sexual functions of the foreskin, it is central to the discussion, similar to the way a discussion on the "the origins of man" would need to address Darwin's thesis.To understand precisely how the foreskin works to generate sexual pleasure is paramount to appreciating its importance, and, conversely, evaluating the significance of its loss, and also for understanding the benefits to be derived from foreskin restoration.

I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying (plus or minus a few quibbles), but the bombastic, shrill presentation of your Web site smacks of a tabloid alien abduction article. There's nothing subtle about it. If Darwin had presented evolution that way, sensible people would have discounted his work.What I'm trying to say is that you're talking down to your audience, as if they're quite stupid. It probably pushes away more potential converts to your ideas than it recruits.

As I stated when I started. I was not arguing the study you point to. It very well may be accurate. However, I usually don't put a lot of weight into just one study on something. Though it is a thought provoker and worth further investigation.

My point, in my statements, was to point out to the original poster that even when a man is cut, that men and women can have a full and enjoyable sex life. As presented, the information seems to indicate that this cannot be true.

Well, something must be amiss because,According to Oprah Winfrey, "Female sexual dysfunction in the U.S. is epidemic."According to Cosmopolitan magazine: "70 per cent of American women surveyed by Cosmo (and researcher Shire Hite) say that can't orgasm from intercourse."Half of all U.S. marriages end in divorce. And it's usually the women initiates the divorce. The man is often taken by surprise. Maybe it's because he has his eyes closed to her dissatisfactions, thinking it couldn't be the sex because he has such a good time.

This thread is REALLY REALLY Old.

The thread may be Old, but the facts haven't changed. Female sexual dysfunction continues to be epidemic in the U.S., where most men are circumcised.

Are you totally hung up on this site from this thread or what?

If a dick is covered with a condom………how is she going to tell? I mean she’ll know by seeing it b4 but I mean the feeling inside her. u can PM me the answer ... cuz i knwo this is a old thread...

Even with a condom on, a woman can tell by the way the man thrusts.Circumcised penis thrusts primarily to stimulate pressure-sensitive sexual nerves located in the middle and lower area of the penis. This is because circumcision has removed thousands of touch-sensitive nerves from the circ upper penis area.Link removed cos its too graphic for the kids on here.

New links for the above post; sanitized for kids.

[http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/why/afraidtoask1.html]0

[http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/why/afraidtoask2.html]1

Quote:Even with a condom on, a woman can tell by the way the man thrusts.I don’t see it…get it. Educate me……………

It's an interesting hypothesis, but it needs a proper study to test it.

Quote:

Even with a condom on, a woman can tell by the way the man thrusts.

My friend, you're quite mistaken. Each man has his own technique and style and "way to thrust" The cut, has nothing to do with it.

I think the guy's assumption is that due to the lack of sexual input that would be the receptors in the foreskin (which is of course a no-brainer; you can't feel what you don't have) and the constant exposure making the glans less sensitive and requiring a more firm input (this /majorly/ depends on the masturbation method of the guy though -- if they crank off directly rubbing the glans I would expect their glans not to register light touch whatsoever -- this is something that we uncuts (at least the vast majority of us) don't ever do, however), the person would have to apply different style to the intercourse.However, Ineligible is correct: proper studies are lacking, and as such, it's more a speculation than a fact.Sorry about the immense amount of interludes in that sentence, I love my parentheses.

Reply to CR125: ...Educate me....You'd have to ask me a more specific question. Did you read the information at the links I posted? I'm forbidden to give you links to the webpages that contain the videos showing how natural and circ thrust differently, but you can track them down by going to:http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com TOP 10 Ways Male Circumcision Harms WomenIn summary,The two types of penises have different primary pleasure zones.The primary pleasure zone is the area on the penis where the man experiences most of his pleasure during intercourse.For the natural penis, the primary pleasure zone is the upper penis, where nature installed thousands of touch-sensitive nerves.For the circumcised penis, the primary pleasure zone is the middle and lower area of the penis. Because circumcision removes thousands of touch-sensitive nerves from the upper penis, the circ penis looks to stimulating its middle and lower area pressure-sensitive nerves for pleasure, and consequently, it thrusts with elongated, forceful thrusts to stimulate these deeply-laden nerves.It's not necessary to wait for a study to prove this. You can prove it to yourself very easily.If you are a man with a fully-functioning foreskin (no phimosis), ask yourself: From what area of the penis do I derive my best sensations during intercourse (forget about masturbation; masturbation is not at issue here)? And when you're thrusting, do you tend to concentrate on stimulating the upper penis area or the lower area of the penis?If you are a man circumcised, ask yourself the same questions.Also, if you watch adult intercourse videos, notice whether the man has a fully-functioning foreskin or whether he is circd and ask these same question during the movie.You should find that men with fully-function foreskins will, by and large and thru most of the intercourse, thrust to stimulate the upper penis area, using strokes that are shorter in length, gentler in force, with a consistent rhythm.Conversely, men who are circd will, by and large and thru most of the intercourse, thrust to stimulate the lower penis area and base/pubic mound region, using strokes that are longer in length, much more forceful (even bangaway), and they often use an irregular, inconsistent rhythm.The evidence there, easily seen in thousands of adult videos. Do your own personal study. Let us know at afraidtoask.com what you found out (not what you surmise might be the case).

For the circumcised penis, the primary pleasure zone is the middle and lower area of the penis. IDK..I don't really believe that. I can't beleive that the Base or middle shaft is more sensitive than the glans and (remaining) inner forskin.

I think he might mean the dorsal vs. ventral side of the glans itself. But I haven’t bothered reading that stuff myself, so dunno.

Well I was going to let this drop but.........

To me thrusts are controlled by the guy (or girl on top).
All I asked (witch u haven't answered -I really don't give a fuck)...but I got a answer that I'm cool with.. And the way she said it made since. But it had nothing to do with thrusting.
U say everything is bad for the woman feels bad for her but when I read it it's sounds to me all about the guy.

The primary pleasure zone is the area on the penis where the man experiences most of his pleasure during intercourse.
For the natural penis, the primary pleasure zone is the upper penis, where nature installed thousands of touch-sensitive nerves < where is the woman in that???

For the circumcised penis, the primary pleasure zone is the middle and lower area of the penis. Because circumcision removes thousands of touch-sensitive nerves from the upper penis, the circ penis looks to stimulating its middle and lower area pressure-sensitive nerves for pleasure, and consequently, it thrusts with elongated, forceful thrusts to stimulate these deeply-laden nerves < again where is the woman in that??? And yea it said something about thrusts...so? I don't have to forceful thrust. My gf likes gentle ... and I give her gentle and we both get off. So I just don't get it.

It's not necessary to wait for a study to prove this. You can prove it to yourself very easily. Prove wut??? That I have no idea wut my gf (or any woman) feels when she gets fucked???? I don't know. That's why I was asking how do women know the difference. So far all I've read is shit about my dick. HELLO!!! I know how my dick feels.

watch adult intercourse videos, < no thank you! I grew up watching the shit. It's disgusting. I don't want to watch perverts fuck!

The evidence there, easily seen in thousands of adult videos. < sound to me u been watching too many of these things.

All I wanted to know is how a woman can tell wut ur dick is like with a COVER on.... Point is u can't tell me. No man can tell me. (unless u had a sex change I guess..) only a woman can cuz only a woman can feel wut a woman feels. It's like a woman telling some one wut a erection feels like or Cumming feelings like.....they can't.. they don't have a dick. (and I know some women can cum.. But I dk if it's like the same or not. We'll never know cuz a woman feels wut she does and men feel wut they do.
And well I hate talking about my dick but......... my dick head is pretty dam sensitive.

I guess my specific question is how can a woman tell wut a guy's penis is?? Thrusting is a thing the guy does it has nothing to do with wuts on his dick...or not on his dick. And the answer well reply not answer.. Had no mention of a woman anyplace in it. It was all about the man.

Originally Posted By: CR125

... how a woman can tell...?
It is a medical fact that the inside of the vagina is devoid of touch-sensitive nerves (nerves that register light-touching). Therefore, a woman is unlikely to feel a difference in touch-type sensations from the penis.

However, the vagina does abound with pressure-sensitive nerves. Women can feel a difference in pressure. Also, the vagina can sense pain. Here is what women say they notice:

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/5broomstick.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/1hook.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/2pump.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/3longstroke.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/4chafing.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/6bangaway.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/4natural.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/5natural.html

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/comments/6natural.html

I can provide you with many more comments from women, but please read these for starters.

Do you have any other evidence aside from this ONE site?I've done enough tramping around that I do have experience with both cut and uncut. I questioned whether cut or uncut were more gentle in my own thread. I couldn't come to a conclusion. HOWEVER your being so adamant about this with only one place of quotation, has really gotten me to thinking and really annalizing my sexual experiences. I as a woman, have answered my own question...as fallows.There have been four lovers in my life that were AWESOME in bed. A few one night stands that don't count for this comparisson, and three that really sucked. Of the four who were awesome, 3 are cut, and one isn't. Of the three who are cut, only one is loosely cut. After really thinking and annalizing, I have come to this conclusion. The three that really sucked in bed, also sucked in life. They were selfish assholes. Period. They ONLY cared about getting what THEY wanted. The four that were awesome, were also awesome people, they have compassion, and a desire to please. The bottom line is that it isn't whether a guy is cut or not, it is whether he gives a shit about the partner he is with. The guy I am with now, is cut, and is the best one yet. But he is the best at everything else too.