Is sex better or worst with foreskin ?

---

Is there any difference?

There have been many threads on this subject. There is no conclusive answer. There is evidence that the exposed glans (head of the penis) loses sensitivity when it's not covered and dries out and gets rubbed in your pants every day. If that is true, it might be helpful for men who have issues with premature ejaculation.

The only way to know is to survey men who are sexually active and uncircumcised, than survey them again years later to find the difference (in their subjective opinion). You might want to exclude men who have been circumcised for medical reasons. All in all, not an easy thing to do.

Thanks. My friend is circumcised but I am not.Maybe we can compare. I am going to have to ask him.

Unless you can swap brains, you can't compare very easily.

That must of hurt.

Yeah but at least its a try.

I been cut almost a year and its just about the same but I would give the edge to being cut for 2 reasons. you get more plesure on the 'out' stroke when your cut and a cut penis provides more stimulation to the girls vagina than uncut.

Still, you don't know how it will feel 10, 20, 30 years from now. And some would argue that the foreskin serves a good purpose for the woman during intercourse.

Around and around we go, the correct answer nobody knows.

How do you "you get more plesure on the 'out' stroke"?

uncut guys have more sensitivity which might feel better for them but cut guys take longer to cum which is better for a girl.

In reply to:but cut guys take longer to cum which is better for a girl That's not entirely true, uncut guys can last just as long, heck even longer, than cut guys. It all depends on the person.Also not every chick wants a guy just pumping away ya know.

In reply to:How do you "you get more plesure on the 'out' stroke"? easy, when your uncut the foreskin wants to recover the head on the out stroke which doesnt feel as strong.

Mine stays back.