Am i gay??
OK, but the people who actually have been adolescent girls and who chose to post to this thread disagree. For the benefit of whoever is reading this thread and wondering why some arbitrary adolescent girl is not getting any dates with guys, you're saying that the likely reason is that she is fat or ugly.
Is it possible that some (many, many?) adolescent girls have a distorted idea of how they look? Did ajmakoko's post compute at all?
I help those girls. I tell them they are pretty! and if they are actually pretty! I tell them They are Hot! :grin: :grin:
thats really shallow man. its people like YOU who make self consciencous girls feel like shit.
Sorry, they're not the same; she offered useful advice and information, while you put up two cryptic and insulting questions. I don't know if anyone else sees things from your viewpoint, but if they do, they haven't posted here yet.
How did you attempt to answer her question?Because I'm looking and see nothing close to an answer from you
What about conciouse males? You think they don't exsist?
I give up. I can't think of any other ways to state it. All I can say is that, even though your questions were directed at the OP, they were not constructive. Either you're yanking my chain, or someone else can give it a shot.
Those are questions not answers
And watch how you address people
What is my viewpoint? That your questions were constructive and not insulting.
I didn't see her other postsWhy didn't you post that sooner instead of carring on like this?
whoa wtf?? i just meant that he pretty well said that if the girl is fat or ugly,then thats why she neve r had sex...i didnt mean to imply about guys....im just comfused now...
Yeah, but her posts do not run contrary to one another...She gets a lot of girl action, but it doesn't turn her on. However, she likes to masturbate to lesbians. She hasn't ever done anything with a guy, but she thinks that kissing an Emo would be hot. She is emotionally attracted to guys, and considers herself straight. She is infatuated with the word meep.The only thing that makes me suspect that she could be a troll would be the voice of her posts... But 15-year-old girls DO type/talk like that. Annoying, yes; uuncharacteristic, no.Just leave her alone; you shouldn't attack someone asking for help if you don't like them, OR if you don't take their posts seriously. Let's give her the benefit of the doubt, and the common courtesy that she, as a human, deserves.
I'm not sure why you would assume that everyone else read, remembered, and/or looked up her other threads. Most people around here are not that obsessive (although some of us are). When people asked you to explain yourself, why did you keep replying with those brief, crytic responses?With that information, I'd have replied to here, "WTF, your other posts said X, Y, and Z. If you're for real, please explain yourself". The question that was posted by the OP is one that many girls might ask. For them, a more tempered response might have been good, as ajmakoko explained.______________________________________teaseme, if you're for real, could you please explain yourself?______________________________________There it is.
Steve called her a skankI did not, and I suspect you realize that. I paraphrased your questions.
I just need to know if being fat & ugly is part of the problem or is it something else.It would have probably been more constructive if you had treated it like it was "something else." So go on, pretend like she has already said, "no, I'm not fat and ugly, I don't know what my problem is....." Because really, being physically unattractive is one of the most obvious solutions, one that she would have come up with herself.
I didn't try to spare her 'feelings'.First, when possible, it is better to spare someone's feelings when trying to get information. It's not like she was pointing a gun at someone.Second, do you see the difference between a question that can be answered objectively, and one that can be answered subjectively?This is really getting weird. The issue is not necessarily that her post is fake, but you really do think those are reasonable questions, and your explanation just ran in circles, until you posted something calling into question her legitimacy. But you still seem to think those questions would be appropriate even if that were the poster's very first post.Very hard to understand.
YA shunta call her a skank even if it is tru
Whadda stoopid person ya r
" for uWhadda stoopid person ya r
In reply to:Whadda stoopid person ya rWow. They handing out laptops on the short bus now?
