firstly i dont have a foreskin im cut and secondly wtf is up with em?? i hear so much about the foreskin im thinkin that my dick isnt right id just like some ppl to clear this up as if does foreskin provide better pleasure and should i have one?? what's the advantages of having foreskin and advantages of NOT having one???? plz shed some light on my little story
-
So.......what's the deal with foreskin and such??
-
well cut or uncut doesnt make it right or wrong, but people have said it can provide more pleasure keeping the head sensitive and all but others have argued against it,otherwise once its cut its gone i think there are surgeries to restore something like it but im not totally sure,but no theres nothing wrong with it being cut
-
well define "sensitive" is that with a foreskin or cut?????
-
well some have said that being cut somewhat desensitizes the head, it getting dried out and such,but this really isnt my area of expertise, you might try the "foreskin" forum
-
what's the foreskin forum??? and what you mean DRIED OUT ........................so if i had foreskin it would be gooey ALL the time?? that's just plain weird to me
-
This is a sensitive subject for a lot of people, but...o a foreskin contains a lot of nerve endingso the frenulum, which connects the foreskin to the bottom of the head of the penis, is very sensitiveo the head of the penis is a mucous membrane (like the inside of your mouth), and when the forskin is removed, it dries out, hardens, and becomes like ordinary skino the foreskin helps some guys when masturbatingo the foreskin may or may not serve some useful mechanical purpose during intercourseMost men are satisified with their penis, circumcised or not.
-
In reply to:
and what you mean DRIED OUT ........................so if i had foreskin it would be gooey ALL the time?? that's just plain weird to me
no.i have a foreskin,so i can speak from experience, the head of an uncircumcised penis is...moist. not gooey.
-
In reply to: no.i have a foreskin,so i can speak from experience, the head of an uncircumcised penis is...moist. not gooey. It's not the same for everyone, cause I have a foreskin but it's always dry and I use lube. Moist? Never.Having a foreskin or not doesn't really matter. The truth is that people with no foreskin tend to be more sensitive during masturbation or sex, compared to people with a foreskin. This is the only differemce I can find, and it means nothing. Anyways, you don't need to "get a foreskin", you need to learn how to take advantage of your circumsized dick. Ignore all the posts about foreskins, and believe me, having a foreskin is not as great as it seems, people just invent stupid foreskin techniques to masturbate with. In reply to: Most men are satisified with their penis, circumcised or not. That's the point here.
-
so a foreskin would make your last longer in bed cause you less sensitive right?? but cut one means you dont have to worry bout tearing your .....umm....fendulum (i hope i spelled that correctly)
-
Not necessarily. Most cut guys quickly overcome their penis sensitivity, and many uncut guys have premature ejaculation problems from having too much foreskin (if it's combined with a small dick).
(btw, the penis head is called "frenulum")
...and I have no info on that (however I do believe that minor injuries can be caused to both cut and uncut guys during intercourse - that is, unless a condom is used) -
Looks like Foreskin ain't so good. In reply to:Male circumcision is emerging as a promising potential method for preventing new infection and teams of researchers are trying to develop microbicides. I'd get cirumcised, I guess, if it prevents diseases!
-
But it prevents diseases! And with a condom! Well, surely I'll have lower chances?51% of people wih AIDS are Gay men,(according to stastic canada) I don't think they are circumcised! Is there no advantage for circumcisin then?
-
\>51% of people wih AIDS are Gay men,(according to stastic canada) I don't think they are circumcised!
Again another statement by you that's soo far off base. I'm cut and every guy I have ever been with was cut.
Regardless if you are cut or uncut always wear a condom and you'll have equal odds. Don't count on being cut as a way of saving you from disease. Just be smart and use a condom.
Edit: Also wanted to add that in the gay male community there is a decrease in infection of HIV/AIDS as there is now an increase in infection in the African American population among men. Though yes it might still be higher in the gay male population it makes me feel good knowing the numbers have dramatically decreased through the years through awareness. -
'Tis what the news said. They had a debate why the prime minister wasn't at the AIDS conference in Toronto.And the statistics are Ontario, the Greater Toronto Area.As I've quoted above, looks like cut has a higher chance to lower diseases!http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4787923.stm, So says Bill Gates
-
Do you honestly think the chance is decreased enough to worry about getting cut this point in life? Absolutely not! I hate it even being said that being cut decreases infection because it's almost like saying "If you're cut it's okay to have unprotected sex" when it's not! Regardless you should always wear a condom because THAT is what will help decrease your odds of infection.
-
It seems that the African Americans are we contrasting more and more, the ones who are in North America. The advocate for AIDS In Canada was on the CTV's Question Period today. He says that the adversiting for Condoms and stuff are now specified for the White community! I think not!
But, there is not alot of advertising for Condoms anymore, its mostly for pop and junk!
According to Charles Watson. By 2010, the gay AIDS thing is going to jump too 60% in Canada! If not taken immidiate action by the Prime Minister! F.U(Females United lol) is some party in Cambridge, near Preston and Hespeler, now want to invoke some law, that every male is circumcised( I dont know why)
Thats all i got from the news and the daily paper. And Stephen Harper is stupid :grin:
-
I've been circumcised for one year. before that I was uncut for 18 years. I dont know why some guys think foreskin is so great because it isn't. I think some gay guys find foreskin sexually exciting which may be one reason for this. my opinion as someone who has had it both ways is you are lucky if you were cut.
-
I dont know why some guys think foreskin is so great because it isn't. The reasons have been listed, what, a dozen times over the past year? You don't seem to be impressed by them, because you keep acting mystified every time the topic comes up.You had a specific medical condition where circumcision was indicated. For the small number of people who have serious phimosis and related issues, circumcision is a blessing. But for the great majority of uncircumcised men who have no such problems, there are some very good arguments not to circumcise.> I think some gay guys find foreskin sexually exciting which may be one reason for this.So you're saying that "gay guys" like the idea of a foreskin? You're not at all impressed by the fact that the foreskin contains numerous nerve endings, that the frenulum is very sensitive, that the head of the penis is a mucus membrane that loses sensitivity when it dries out and rubs against underwear, etc.? Because I don't recall that you actually responded to any actual arguments (correct me if I'm wrong), although you might have said that a circumcision is good therapy for premature ejaculation.I'm glad your circumcision has worked out so well, and I realize that you feel like you're holding the fort for the pro-circumcision crowd, but your experience is very specific, and you yourself constitute a very small sample size.
-
hey steve.....that's why they invented loose boxers oh btw.......steve.........seriously YOUR TOO SMART MAN but it's cool
-
josh, I dont know why some want to make cut guys feel like they're missing something. perhaps becasue they feel better themselves??? anyway, the result is the same either cut or uncut. the techinque is slightly diff.