Incest?

---

Be careful in assuming your intelligence. Your deluded, inexpedient confidence make you easy and enticing prey for your betters.

Originally Posted By: OldFolksBe careful in assuming your intelligence. Your deluded, inexpedient confidence make you easy and enticing prey for your betters. ...of which I am one!

Scotty is a pretty bright fucker himself, I sometimes debate getting out a dictonary to read some of his posts.I always thought I was smart, I mean, I understaood Fraisure ! I sometimes dont catch all of scotties meanings with uot looking up a few words first though.

im going to have to agree with Helms, noone is nearly as impressed as you think they should be with your fabulous deduction.Dont let my typing fool ya, Im a pretty bright mother fucker.care to get into specifics?In some fields Im willing to bet youd score near 10 while I scored near 100. in others im betting youd win, especially math, its never been a strong point for me, I have to sti downa nd write shoit out to do wmath, I cant and never have been able to do it in my head.I still scored 142 on a college issued IQ test, I can look at something and figure out how it works in a few minutes. I do my own contracting, I can bid a job in minutes with out writing shit up simply because of how my brain works. Im building a deck right now for a woman, it took me about 20 minutes to figure out how, and where to put the footings and piers, and what to build it out of and how much of each wood Id need. It took more time to go price out supplies than it did to figure out what I needed. same thing on any project. Its all in how my brain works.im no slouch, Id bet at any given subject youd find plenty of people on these boards that would whoop your ass in knowledge. I learn all that shit long ago and have forgotten more than you know. If i id otn sue the shit I learn I eventually discard it.I once could speak german pretty damned well, now 20 years later I only remember some basics and how to tell you to go fuck yourself.

I find it odd that quite a few people are posting in argument against me, after I said that I thought this subject really shouldn't continue, and the fact that I basically admitted that there probably were multiple errors in my assumptions. I don't see why people seem to argue against something I have already acknowledged as an error.Yes, I know there are people more proficient in certain subjects. I'm not here to impress anyone, it's the internet where my identity is not known. It doesn't make sense for me to try to impress anyone if there's no benefit gained from it. I'd rather show my knowledge or lack of knowledge than try to impress people on the internet.I don't care whether or not 95% of the regular visiters might be smarter than I am. Partly because chances are that I am younger than they are, and the fact that I go on forums where 99% of the regular members are probably smarter than me in almost all areas (partly due to age as well, but there are others my age that are smarter than I am).Please don't assume that I'm trying to impress anyone.

To thos day I still remmeber a dream I had of having "sex" even though I barely knew waht it was at the time with my half-sister, I was like 6 or so, so I didn't really know what incest was or if it was wrong etc..

That's odd. I've never heard of something like that happening. Kindof reminds me of this optical illusion. Almost anyone older than a child that has an understanding of sex, will see some sort of erotic picture with a man and a woman (like the man holding the woman, both naked). And then any children that see it will see dolphins.

Just replying to the problem that I seem to have created here. It irritated me that you said something along the lines of " I bet that flew over 95% of the people on these forums. "You could have stated your idea, then gone on to explain exactly what you meant by it , rather than making a statement that is bound to irritate people - and looks as though you are implying that you are well above the intelligence level found on these forums. Someone replied to your post saying that they thought Freud's theories were pretty much all rubbish, then you seemed to assume they knew nothing about Freud and wanted you to explain the Oedipus complex to them. It comes across as patronising and.. well.. just plain rude. Back on topic now, also replying to Cider.. I remember that picture. Even as a child I saw a man and a woman!

It was more posted as a joke for the first post and then the second was to explain to anyone who didn't know what it was.I don't think I ever saw the optical illusion when I was a kid, but it was a little difficult to find the dolphins at first. Maybe what you see depends on what past images you've seen before, so those that are more ignorant to those things when they are younger will see dolphins, but those that have seen sexual/erotic stuff like that won't see the dolphins. That might be why Thatguy had the dream, dunno though.

I just found the picture on the internet... Which do you see?? Dolphins, or a man and a woman?

lmao! Where the hell are the dolphins?

I KNOW!! i cant see them either!!!

The dolphins are teh dark parts, the shading that makes up between the arms, a tail for her snatch.... see em now?

I SEE THEM!! lol! i was trying for ages to see if i could find themm thanks

i saw teh dolphins...hiding over there

It took me a while to find the dolphins myself... look harder at the pic and you'll see it

theyre off to the side

Well, I finally see them, but not in her snatch. I see them where her arms go up....the dark parts. They are super small....who the hell would see that when they first look at that pic?!Oh, you did say 'arms'. lol I was distracted by snatch. Sorry Chance hunny!

There are 10 of 'em (dolphins), I see hun. Your just a perv, looking at dirty picture.

LOL, I wonder what Angel and Eddie see. They are the big pervs around here.