Turn off for some girls?

---

I'm 14 and I still haven't made it past 1st base (kissing) yet. My dick's about 5.25 in. long and 3.5 around. *****The other day I was with my friend and these 2 girls alone at her house. My friend is 13 and still hasn't started puberty. I was imagining getting a blowjob that day with my friend and the 2 girls (it never happened). I know I must be bigger than my friend, but I was wondering if my dick size would turn the girls off or I would get made fun of. Any girls reading this around the ages of 13,14, or 15, can you give me an honest answer if you care about size? I know it's been brought up but the answers always are from a broader range.

That wouldn't turn off any girl, period.

Also, you're 14, you don't need to be having sex or get past 1rst base.

I know it shouldn't be happening at my age, but the way this day and age is, it's probably more than likely.

You're fine, don't worry about it, especially since you're 14.ADDED: Quote:I know it shouldn't be happening at my age, but the way this day and age is, it's probably more than likely. It doesn't mean YOU have to do anything.

No... no it's not. I'm 21, not some old person :P, it would only happen at your age because you think you need to, because "everyone else" your age is, truth is, no one else really your age is. For gods sake, you have a friend that hasn't even hit puberty yet!

I'm a guy and just wanted to say. You have nothin to worry about with 5 inches. that's nice! And don't worry about making it past first base. It'll come sooner or later. (prolly not too much longer)Ps I'm 13 and only 4.25 inches. made to 3rd base, but my GF and i have been together for 7 months. So just relax, and find someone you really care about. THEN worry about second base.

Originally Posted By: derek8148I know it shouldn't be happening at my age, but the way this day and age is, it's probably more than likely. well, i actually think that, at different times in the past, people were having sex MORE at a younger age. after all, many girls would be mothers, and some have children, by the age of 14 in many cultures a long time ago. it was natural then, and it's natural now. nothings really changed, just the attitude that teenage sex is looked down upon. i'm not saying that teens should be going off and having sex all the time, i'm just saying that things like this happened all the time in different cultures and different times.

after all, many girls would be mothers, and some have children, by the age of 14 in many cultures a long time ago. it was natural then, and it's natural now. nothings really changed, just the attitude that teenage sex is looked down upon. Teens (girls) in ages past were often married to older men or into a family where thay could live normally.. Nowadays, teens who become pregnant are often incapable of living a normal life. The times have changed and thus teenage sex (bcause of the pregnancy risk) is frowned upon.

Quote:after all, many girls would be mothers, and some have children, by the age of 14 in many cultures a long time ago.These young girls were married off to much older men, either for social class or religion. They have no choice in the matter and are forced to have sex, either for children or for sexual pleasure. It's culture but does it make it right? Hell no.* Even today, these religious sects still do exist where young girls forced to have sex.*And, I know we should all respect other people's culture, religion, and traditions but when it comes to the abuse of young children, that's a no go for me. Just my personal opinion. Quote:it was natural then, and it's natural now. nothings really changed, just the attitude that teenage sex is looked down upon.Sex is natural, no argument there. But sex is also about responsibility and that's what a lot of teenagers lack in. They are either uninformed or ignorant. And if something like pregnancy does happen, it's looked down upon because it's so easily preventable.

i think that you misunderstood me. i never said that it was right. in fact, in my last post i tried to make it understood that i didn't necassarily think that it was right. maybe i could have made that more clear. i just said that it also happened a long time ago. like someone here said, the times have changed and teens aren't ready to have a baby at there age like teens might have been at other times in history

Originally Posted By: A Vi just said that it also happened a long time ago. like someone here said, the times have changed and teens aren't ready to have a baby at there age like teens might have been at other times in history Teens are never ready for a baby, no matter what day it is. Like I said, young girls were forced to have babies because that is what was taught. They were able to take care of the baby but that doesn't mean they were ready in any means. And even if it is an old way of life, it still exists today sadly.

The young teens that had babies, also had a very high chance of dying during labor, or shortly after due to infection, since they were young also, they're bodies couldn't handle it right. There was also infant mortality rate that was high, so you need a lot of kids to begin with so one or two grows up. Times have changed.

Originally Posted By: Virtual\_Star
Originally Posted By: A V
i just said that it also happened a long time ago. like someone here said, the times have changed and teens aren't ready to have a baby at there age like teens might have been at other times in history
Teens are __never__ ready for a baby, no matter what day it is. Like I said, young girls were forced to have babies because that is what was taught. They were able to take care of the baby but that doesn't mean they were ready in any means. And even if it is an old way of life, it still exists today sadly.
well it depends on exactly what age the teen is at. if a girl is 13, then she's more than likely not ready at all. if she's 17 or 18, she's probably ready.

Splitting hairs doesn't make a difference. I'm 21 and I'm still no where near ready for a kid. And teens at 17-18 are the same because at that time, they are just beginning the rest of their lives. Having sex and ending up pregnant is going to be a very rocky start to life.But we got far from the point. Bottom line, the OP is only 14. The last thing he and other kids at his age needs to worry about is sex.

i don't know if you're misunderstanding me, or what. but just to clear things up, i do agree with you (mostly). and when i say that most 17 and 18 year olds are ready, i mean physically, not mentally. some won't be ready, others will. maybe not mentally, but physically there body is ready. i'm not saying that they'd ALL be ready, but most. so just try to FULLY understand what i'm saying instead of assuming that i mean this or that. (sorry if that came off as rude to you. it wasn't meant to.) so if you disagree with any of that now, we disagree. at least, i can't word it any better.just wanted to clear that up. but anyway, ya, think that dereck probably should not be having sex

Originally Posted By: A Vand when i say that most 17 and 18 year olds are ready, i mean physically, not mentally. some won't be ready, others will. maybe not mentally, but physically there body is ready. i'm not saying that they'd ALL be ready, but most....(sorry if that came off as rude to you. it wasn't meant to.)Yup, much that's much clearer. I misunderstood. knocks head But you rude? Nah, never crossed my mind.

When that was widely practiced, the life expectancy was only about 30 to 40 years old.if you had kids later on than the mid to late teens, youd leave them orphaned as youd yourself more than likely be dead before they became adults.The only place (tha I know of ) that that shit is still pushed today is right here in Utah.Colorado city a copuple hours south of me.Jeffs is in prison, but his shit still stinks, and his shit still rules the mormon (not claimed by the current momrons but an offshoot of htem called FLDS f being fundamentalists) 14 year old girls marry and have childrens with men 2 and 3 times thier age, often uncles or cousins and its all set up by the town leaders. Youung men are compatitiion for them, they are often booted out and found wandering the desert near st george while the young girls are married off and used and abused and made good lttle mommies.Want to look into the shit? google FLDS and Warren Jeffs and Colorado City. enjoy the readings.

Originally Posted By: derek8148I know it shouldn't be happening at my age, but the way this day and age is, it's probably more than likely. How about being one of those rare stand-up kids who have the balls to swim upstream and do what's right, not a bunch of other kids who could give a rip about you are doing.You're better than that, right?

Agreed (You know, we can debate on a lot of things, but agree on most)

it seems across the nation tons of kids my age are fucking each other like ALL the time, but honestly, around here, its not a big deal. like at our school, if a girl has sex, and people find out, shes a slut. i was actually kinda surpised. i mean for upperclassmen its kinda different, but for us i definitely thought more people would be fucking each other.