Talking about it all.

---

I haven't been on this forum in a while but i like the way it can be used also to vent any concerns or brake throughs and is an enclosed community of sympathy.

That's not really the point of my post. :frowning:

I went on to the information section and i'm ranging between stage 2 and stage 4 of penis development in the sense that i have alot of pubic hair, but my penis does not resemble that of an adult one in the sense that it has grown beyond the size of a prepubecent one but it has not "grown [much] longer, and got [much] wider. The glans, or head, of the penis [have not] become much more prominent."

I suppose it's a big relief because i am incredibly concerned about when i'll finish puberty. I started around 14, (I'm coming up to my sixteenth this summer). When i mean started i mean i saw some changes, i seemed to have had a swollen left testicle since about the age of twelve, but pubic hair only really grew when i got to around 14 and the penis growth has not been rapid enough for me to notice the difference over the period of time. The reason it's a relief is because i was unsure, due to my other adolecent developments, as to whether my penis would grow any longer. I am growing "whiskers" on my chin, hair under my arms and grew about 7 inches (in height!) in the last year so i was wondering when down south would kick off.

If i take the upper bound of five years, till the end of development, though it'll be pretty gutting really, i suppose the last year out of 5 is stage five and so my penis would be pretty "primed" anyway. The frustration is that i have been in sooooo many situations where girls have clearly insinuated oral or sex, when sober! It is really frustrating because i want to join the band wagon and it's sod's law that i'm getting the offers but have to turn them down!

My erection is pretty long, but again, it has no resemblance to an adult one. The head unlike as i've seen in pornos (the only source of info, be it bias) is not very triangular and the foreskin does not pull back (not through force but by the erection) all the way to the point of the head being completely revealed and the foreskin seemingly unnoticeable. Which again i suppose is a plus because despite these undevelopments i do have a 6" erection or so.

The reason for my late development is down to genetics unfortunately. :frowning: Both my parents were late comers, or so they say.
My real hope is that my penis will have developed sufficiently enough so that this time next year i can be confident to go into a relationship without having to worry about what they say when they want sex. :frowning: It's holding me back. I find it really easy to speak to women, make them laugh, flirt with them and form a friendship but i never feel i can go any further because i'm being held back by my pants. : (

Hi anothermember. I don't know about girth, but in length you are not lacking. Could it be that genetically yours is just shaped a bit differently to the ones you've seen in porn and pictures? Heads, in particular, come in all shapes and sizes.Have you tried stretching the foreskin so it can be pulled back? That doesn't have to happen automatically in erection - for some guys it does, and for some it doesn't, but provided you can pull it back it's fine.

Yeah, i suppose it could be a different shape. But it's one of those niggles really. I'm a very very very self conscious person and i am able to appear confident and out going around people because i big myself up mentally, i have alot of physical features that may seem unnattractive or could be considered a self-esteem hinderence and the last thing i need is another one that i've got to big myself up about and talk my way out of. I suppose i've got 2/3 years before i should be concerned. ?Jez,

I doubt that you need talk your way out of your penis size at all - it seems like the length is over average.Penis size issues are very often really issues about self-esteem and self-confidence generally - hung guys can feel insecure and less-endowed guys can be perfectly fine with it. I wouldn't be surprised if the other physical features also were not as bad as you think.

It's reply only my flacid penis - it fluxuates immensely in size. But it's not big, when it resembles a normal penis, so when the head is larger than that of the "stem" and the foreskine almost covers the whole of the penis it is very small/ But as i said it fluxuates, so after the toilet, normally a number 2, due to the use of muscles i suppose, it is long, around 4/5 inches. Sometimes it'll become really thin and it's because of this i feel there is more to come because the girth isn't very large when flacid and it's like looking at some before and after puberty, my penis still seems to reflect that of a younger person. As well as that, my right testicle hasn't developed yet, whilst my left has. I know the left one is normally larger than the right but the right one doesn't have "the spaghetti" that is talked about in the Ask the Doc bit and my ejaculations aren't that great, so i'm staying optimistic. :]

It's normal for flaccid penises to vary a lot, and often they look very unimpressive, but grow to something much better.Testicles develop at the same time. The 'spaghetti' isn't necessarily obvious. What is wrong with your ejaculations?

Well my right one definently hasn't developed the same time as my left. I mean definently definently not, the left one is far far greater and more developed than the right. The ejaculations just aren't that big, probably because of my right testical.

I agree. An apparently underdeveloped testicle would seem a good reason for talking to a doctor, and having a professional look at it seems the only way to have it properly assessed.

It's true. It's just actually pushing myself into doing it. My Dad's a doctor, but i just don't have, get this pun, the balls to ask for a check up.

Hey man I kinda can relate to ur story cuz i am 14 and my penis is only 4-5 inches hard but i was wondering about ur testicles and i just thought that maybe the right 1 isn't the messed up one I mean it's just a thought though please reply so i can see if my statement was a stupid one.-I agree with the rest though see a doctor.

It's not at all stupid to suggest that if testicles are very different sizes it could be a problem in the bigger one rather than the smaller one, Problems30. Indeed, more often than not that will be true.In this case I think it's going to need a professional eye - we just don't know enough.Usually when people complain about testicles being different sizes they are actually normal, because it's normal for them not to be identical; and it's normal for them to be at different heights which makes them look different sizes even if they are the same. But sometimes, and especially when the difference is large, there is genuinely a problem, and you don't want to take a chance on your testes.

Well it's good to hear that I wasn't wrong and I hope that there are no problems with AnotherMembers testes I hope all go well.