Please...lets don't get going with this its cleaner and easier stuff again guys. Some of us are uncut and some are cut. Its no big deal really and my uncut penis is as clean as anyone elses cut one...and it isn't that big of a deal in terms of being more or less "easy" to take care of.
-
How many people are cut and uncut?
-
I am, and I though t5hat most people were.
-
In the world as a whole...a vast majority are NOT circumcised.
-
My dick's cut and I prefer it like that. Kinda like women who shave their pussies and women who don't. Both are good, but some prefer the clean look of a bald cunt or a circumsized cock.
-
Only about 20% of the world male population is circumcised. That of course, makes 80% intact, uncut. So, if you're circumcised, you are in the minority in the worldwide male population.
-
Cool. It's about damned time I'm a minority!
-
Uncut and like to not have to use lube as much as I can imagine some cut guys do for the added "friction". I can't imagine it's being done for sanitary reasons myself... It's only a problem for uncut guys if they never take a shower IMHO. lol... I mean, if you shower regularly and (of course! everyone should do that anyway) your penis too, big deal. Nothing "extra" to take care of at all here.I personally believe it's a lot due to religion which in some cases has later become tradition in USA, and in others stayed for religious reasons.
-
Americans are obsessed with cleanliness (in the view of a lot of the rest of the world).
-
Americans have been encultured to be more sensitive to odors than many other cultures.But there's now evidence linking America's increasing cleanliness with the increasing incidence of asthma and various allergies. Plus excessive washing dries the skin and disturbs the "friendly" bacteria on your skin, which makes you more vulnerable to infection and other skin problems. It's not good to use an anti-bacterial soap for routine washing. And lots of washing consumes a lot of water (heavy consumption being very American also).Also, humans, like animals, produce pheremones, so getting really clean before having sex may be counterproductive (or counter-reproductive).Did you know that refillable soap dispensers (the ones that are refilled by pouring in liquid soap, rather than by replacing a cartridge) are wonderful places for pathogenic bateria to grow?
-
dodging the question are we steve. im uncut and proud of it! i laugh at america and its cleanliness! ha!
-
I'm uncut. And I only know one person who is cut.Everyone else i no is uncut.I would like to know wot it would be like to be cut, but if i was given the choice, I wouldn't. Something like that is permenant and there are some risks. Besides, why destroy something that works fine!
-
In reply to: I would like to know wot it would be like to be cut, but if i was given the choice, I wouldn't. Something like that is permenant and there are some risks. There are no risks to being circumcised. You might argue that there are disadvantages, but there are no risks.
-
There certainly are risks (mainly infection); it's a surgical procedure. Someone just posted a few days ago about how badly his circumcision went. He had a bad infection, and now needs to go back for more surgery.
-
I hate it when people say that it's cleaner to cut off 30% of the penis' skin. it is SOO easy to clean. (warm water, soap, finished) it a lot harder to clean under fingernails but we don't rip those off the first chance that we get. and about getting cut there are risks, infection is one, and so are skin bridges (that is where you grow skin that connects the glans and the shaft of the penis after scar tissue grows together. it makes a kind of loop or "bridge") and sometimes those who are circumcised DIE from either bleeding, "galloping gangrene", infection,or the anaesthesia used. and ALL types of surgery have risks. but the bad things about circumcision are not from the actual removal of the foreskin (in which they actually cut a vertical line down it, RIP it from the glans, and then tear/ cut if off) but appear later in life like impotency, painful erections, wound re-opening, psychology trauma resulting in elective muteness, a smaller penis, increased risk of HIV, and the foreskin has over 20,000 extra sensitive nerve endings in it and it is not just a "flap of skin" as many call it, but an important organ measuring about 15 square inches (about the same as an index or post card). Also the skin on the glans becomes less sensitive after the skin dries up and scabs over after scraping and rubbing against the inside of pants, and the ability to feel pleasure in the glans reduce greatly, while the ability to feel pain stays about the same. I am not cut and i am very, very grateful. if anyone here is thinking about cutting their son in the future, please don't, he will thank you.
-
of course im cut. there's noway in hell i would want to have such an ugly dick.
-
An uncut dick isn't ugly, in my opinion.
-
thats cool. everyone has fetishes and i ain't gonna hold that against someone.
-
In reply to: There certainly are risks (mainly infection); it's a surgical procedure. Someone just posted a few days ago about how badly his circumcision went. He had a bad infection, and now needs to go back for more surgery. You're certainly right. There are risks involved with the process of circumcision, as there is with any medical procedure. What I actually meant was, once you are 'successfully' circumcised, there is no risk involved with BEING circumcised.
-
The problem with the word "circumcision" is that it describes the process of surgically modifying the penis, as well as the result of the modification.
-
In reply to:thats cool. everyone has fetishes and i ain't gonna hold that against someone. you're trying to say me thinking an uncut dick isn't ugly is a fetish? yeah whatever..........I live in the UK where hardly anyone is cut, all i have ever experienced are uncut men, its the norm here, it isn't a fetish its my opinion.