The jury took their time, not as if they came back within 3 days with a verdict (as someone above said), so they must have gone over the evidence fully. Personally I think he was innocent, the amount of money he has who wouldn't have a go? I just think he's fucked up mentally, as we see from the documentary that was shown over here about 2 yers back.
-
The bugger!
-
They didn't consider all potential evidence covering all aspects of his life. All we can say is that the jury decided that the evidence they considered didn't meet the legal standard of guilt in the locality where the trial was held.It doesn't mean that he's not a child molester. But it doesn't mean that he is one, either. But I sure as shite wouldn't think much of a parent who'd let their child spend the night with him (in his bed) at this point.
-
the bugger. who? im british i dont get this thread... u go o.j simpson i pity the fool!
-
oh rite it michael jackson... obviously the jury was too chicken to convict him, and michael to rich to be convicted..
-
That's probably it.