Do any straight boys like being sucked by a boy?

---

In reply to: Look here and you'll see that the context was completely different. Please, Steve, tell us all how the context was different and you were justified for saying it but I wasn't. That is so your M.O. In reply to: Was it another case where you were trying to score points, and you were typing so fast you didn't take the time to understand what was being discussed? You really need to watch it here. I sure the hell am not trying to score points off you. No one wants to read another pissing contest, and I don't care who's dick is bigger.

What I'm going to say pretty much restates your last paragraph...Frankly, I don't care who believes what. But when people's beliefs affect the way they treat other people because they don't like their morality, then we have a problem. But how do you reason with someone who uses their religious beliefs to prop up their bigotry? It may be fun to argue that someone's religion is stupid if it's the basis of their intolerance toward people, but it doesn't really accomplish much._______________________________________________________________And what is the effect when folks who claim to be religious (I'm talking about you, Damien), keep their mouths shut when their religious brethren spew vile hatred, as the formed head of the Southern Baptist Convention did on several occasions? What did the Jews in Germany think when the Nazi were spewing their odious garbage, and no one said anything?Damien> You really need to watch it here. I sure the hell am not trying to score points off you.Whatever I say, you will just say the opposite. You will just start typing without grasping the facts or the context. Your typing fingers are powered by your emotions. At least, that's been my experience recently. Anyway, your argument about white_lines and plagiarism is completely idiotic. Here is a reference. You must have missed it earlier, which is why I said you're not keeping up. But if you were already familiar with his posts, you wouldn't have needed to look at that.As far as the semi-subject of this thread is concerned, which is homosexual acts, I find it disturbing that you're completely absorbed by the side show of religious debates and such. The fact is that there is still an issue about the way homosexuals are treated, and your silence on that issue is conspicuous.

First off Damien, the accounts of Josephus were written sometime between A.D.65 and A.D.70 by our current calendar (the exact date isn't known) and the earliest of the Canonical gospels was written at approximately the same time. From their similarities (and most importantly their common mistakes), it's clear that the source was the same for both of them (and since Josephus wasn't even born at the time of the supposed crucifixion of Christ, it can't possibly have been first-hand knowledge). This date is at least 30 years after the (alleged) death of Christ which supposedly occurred sometime between A.D.29 and A.D.32 although again the exact date isn't known and has been inferred by many historians from events mentioned in other sources. Other sources such as Tacitus, Eusebius and Philo can all be shown to be unreliable in certain important details which renders them all meaningless in REAL terms (unless you're a hard-core Catholic as I used to be, in which case they're obviously true ).By contrast, some of the Gnostic gospels were written before this (again no solid dates but at least 15-20 years earlier for the very earliest ones) and disagree wildly with the version of events offered by Josephus and the 4 accepted evangelists. It's possible (and in fact is claimed) that many of these were written by contemporaries/friends/associates of Jesus but again, nobody really knows for sure.You state that most of the new testament was written by Jesus' contemporaries but this seems very unlikely. Although it's impossible to be absolutely certain, it's highly probable that the writers of the three later gospels would have been more than 100 years old AT THE TIME THAT THEY WROTE THEM if they were contemporaries of Jesus. It's possible that they were written 70 years before being made available to an audience but I don't think any sensible person genuinely believes this.The bible in the format that we know it today, dates from no earlier than the middle of the 2nd century A.D., at least 120 years after the reputed death of Jesus Christ.

My poor, poor memory. That pretty well comports with what I've read. Thank you, BB, for jogging my rusty brain.

Firt of all, you have no cause or right to be so fucking judgmental. In reply to: The fact is that there is still an issue about the way homosexuals are treated, and your silence on that issue is conspicuous. Not so much. You absolutely cannot attribute things to me based on what I don't say...or the fact that you don't think I say enough about what you want me to speak to. Furthermore... In reply to: But when people's beliefs affect the way they treat other people because they don't like their morality, then we have a problem. I happen to totally agree with this statement. The problem is the majority of posters here are incredibly intolerant and narrow minded. If I say one thing, all sorts of assumptions will be made about me that aren't true. Hell, you just did it based on my not saying anything! So I choose to just keep out of it sometimes. Oh yeah...I never claimed to be "religious".

Firt of all, you have no cause or right to be so fucking judgmental.What do you mean "no right"? I have no right to independent thought?>> The fact is that there is still an issue about the way homosexuals are treated, and your silence on that issue is conspicuous.> Not so much. You absolutely cannot attribute things to me based on what I don't say...or the fact that you don't think I say enough about what you want me to speak to.One can draw certain conclusions about a person who frequently posts to threads about subjects that are of some deep concern to him (based on his past posts), but never addresses the actual subject, and only deals with the diversionary side shows. This is a ontological observation, not an epistemological one.> The problem is the majority of posters here are incredibly intolerant and narrow minded.Welcome to the human race. No cure has yet been found.> Oh yeah...I never claimed to be "religious".You believe in God? The Christian version? That's not exactly irreligious.

1. I was pissed off. I have that right.2. "Deep concern to him" is totally your judgment. You don't really know what I'm deeply concerned with.3. I don't see the point in stating my views on a subject everytime the subject comes up. Sometimes I just choose to say out of it. That's my prerogative and not a basis for you to make judgments about me.4. You're right. No cure has yet been found for intolerance and narrow mindedness and a lot of other things. But I don't have to subject myself to them.5. I do believe in God. The "Christian version". I am a Christian. But that is not the same thing as "religious".6. As for the original topic of this thread, no thanks, I would not like to be sucked off by a boy.

I was pissed off. I have that right.Yes you do.> As for the original topic of this thread, no thanks, I would not like to be sucked off by a boy.Me neither.

It's probably a little late to chip in xDBut anyway, to people who think being gay is a 'sin': Don't you think that God would love everybody, no matter their sexuality? God doesn't want people to discriminate in my opinion.But on topic, i've never been sucked off by a guy. It'd be fun though =D

Yep, I agree. God loves everyone regardless of what they do. Straight, gay, lesbian, transgendered, asexual, compulsive masturbator, porn addict, pedophile, that guy who posted on another thread about being in love with a horse...none of these groups get any more of God's love than the others. Plain and simple.

i like females and shemales, does that make me gay?

mark72> i like females and shemales, does that make me gay?No, that just makes you interesting.Damien> Yep, I agree. God loves everyone regardless of what they do.Suppose you're the most perfect human who ever lived, but you don't accept the divinity of Jesus. Where then does Jesus say you'll wind up after you die? Is that love? (John 14:6)I guess ones interpretation depends on how fundamentalist one is.

Don't worry. God loves you too Steve.

Will He love me by proxy when I'm in Hell, having been put there by Him because I don't accept the divinity of His son?

sure

Cool. You know, if we could exploit hell's heat, we could end our dependence on Middle Eastern oil.

Well...you're pretty smart...If you can figure out how to do that I'll definitely buy stock in Steve A, Inc. Then I can for sure open up my little coffee shop in my small college town in Kentucky.

Thank you Have I mentioned that I almost went to a seminary when I was 11? Good thing I didn't since I'm no longer convinced of the existence of God (not sure that he doesn't exist either though).

im with u on that one.ive sucked dik but not mor times than iv been sucked so it cancels out i guess.and i still love it and would do it every chance i get.HA Bitches.lmfao

Ok well ive had sex with about 3 boys now (blowjobing and penis up arse sorta thing) and well i was 6 with first 10 with 2nd and 11m with teh other