reading this board youd think at least 1/2 of uncut guys have phimosis or some other foreskin disease. does anyone know for real what % of uncut guys have problems?
What % of foreskins are diseased?
Maybe, just maybe, the reason they come to this board is because they have a problem. And again maybe, just maybe, people who don't have a problem with their foreskin don't post.
why would someone come to this board just to post: "I have a foreskin and I have no problems! unlucky all you losers with phimosis, etc.!"
see... this board is pretty much exclusively used for discussing problems, if you have no problem and you also have no constructive advice, then perhaps this is not the board for you.
actually all you did was restate what joe did with bigger words.his point was made, if you have a foreskin and you have no problems you wouldnt post about it on a site that is people asking questions about a screwed up foreskin.I got that from his post before I ever read yours, looks like he had consructive shit to add to the conversation despite your opinion.Now, go moderate something someplace else.
i do know of his post history, but this post looked like blatant trolling to me, sorry."CIrcumcision better HIV prevention than condom use""slate mag: over 2/3 of guys who got cut prefer it"if this guy honestly doesn't have an agenda, then i'm sorry, but if he can find statistics and studies to back up that circumcision is "better", then I'm sure he can just as easily find the answer to the question he posed.
There is a comparison of varoius studies at
It would seem that around 10% of uncut boys/men have some difficulty in retracting, but that doesn't mean to say that their foreskins are "diseased", just tight. And in some cases it is a short frenulum, or adhesions between glans and foreskin causing the problem.