As a middle-aged woman...

---

Bob is not being rude, you filthy whore.

In reply to: you filthy whore hey thats a little to far dont you think?

Thats only if you believe that I don't adore Abby.

bite meI haven't even slept with anyone! 'cept my blankie sucks thumb

Bitch please!

A little late for a reply, but whatever.What's the point of sharing your opinion when it's been shared? Do you just want to let people know you can actually express your opinion, or do you desire your voice to be heard so much on a forum? It's obscure to me why it's a necessity, maybe I'm an asshole and just spew irrational shit. It still looks pointless to me.

If you want to point out posts that are not too useful, you picked an odd one to go after. If you're saying that the same opinion didn't need to be repeated yet again by another person, you have to realinze that a lot of questions are answered in the form of a poll. Six people can say one thing, and two people can say another thing. Then the OP can decide that the majority is right, or that the minortiy is right, if their arguments are better, or are more in line with what the OP wanted to hear.In a question like one regarding adults having sex with pre-adolescents, you're not likely to get a deep, academic analysis. People will post from their gut.You can certainly make a case that a "37-year-old" having sex with a 13-year-old is very wrong, but it's not like the OP asked what 2 + 2 equals. In that case, once someone posts "4", it would be pretty silly for more people to post "4", and say how much they agree with a previous poster's "4". In realty, someone would hijack the thread after the first "4" and discuss their car's 4-cylinder engine or their 4-inch penis or some such thing.[Today feels like a real essay day.]

Clever but think, is anyone going to post, "Yes, yes it is ok! It is just a phase to fuck little kids. I don't see anything wrong with that."
I understand what you are getting at. I still think it's shit though. She wasn't even really helping she is just saying she thinks it's wrong, "I was totally going to do a sexual act with a child until I read your post!".

I believe she had a lack of a childhood maybe and she thinks that children are a way to re-live her lost childhood. Or she is having depressional issues with mid-life crisis to an extreme level that could result in abuse to herself and or others.

Jeeez, you should look up the thread on bestiality. All of the responses were either "that's sick", "you're sick", or "you're a sick motherfker". I tried to subtly ask the question, "Why is it considered sick". The responses were, "You're sick" or "you're a sick motherfker".That pretty much what you can expect for topics like bestiality and pedophilia.Technically, the OP didn't ask for help; just whether folks thought it was "wrong", whatever the, ummm, professor meant by that. The bottom line is that that person needs to be directed to professional health, and the sooner the better. There's not much anyone here can do about it.(Is the story even true? There's no way to know, but we're supposed to assume that it is; even if it's not, the responses might benefit someone else in the OP's fictional situation.)

I'm thinking the issue may be one of self-esteem. Surely the OP needs support to live a moral life, rather than condemnation of what is not under her control.When you think about it, it's not at all unusual for people to have sexual interests it would be wrong to act on. Most married men would have that when a good-looking woman passes by. We don't condemn the men for wanting to shag the woman, if they in fact refrain from doing so.

kiwi, stop being a dick.i mean really, u said my post was pontless, but wasnt makeing a post to say that my post was pointless also, very very pointless.i understand ur just takeing ur anger and frustration out on me but in future, if u have a bitchy oppinion about me, id rather not hear it, thanx..........dick

It's weird that you mention that because most men wouldn't bring it up nor make a post about it on a forum. Unless she is REALLY worried about the situation then she would know she is thinking inexact. I would think most pedophiles and or child molesters would neglect their problems.

I would think most pedophiles and or child molesters would neglect their problems.Why? Some people have problems they can't control, but they know they have a problem, and they are very concerned, and sometimes suicidal. Of course, that depends on whether you define problem as "thinking about things" or "doing things".

I've never heard of a pedophile feeling concerned for the childs saftey during the acts of molestation. Or feeling concerned about the act that they are doing. I'm probably wrong though.

I define a problem as "doing things".

There are pedophiles who have impulses that they can't seem to control, just like compulsive gamblers and compulsive crack users, who know what they are doing causes great harm, yet they still can't stop. That might not apply to all pedophiles, but it certainly seems to apply to some.

You're right man, thanks for clearing that up