This is probably going to sound weird, but I'm curious how hairy females can actually get if they remain completely natural (i.e. no trimming/shaving). I've heard that most girls do groom themselves, so the first question may be hard to answer. But the second one should be easier because even if you shave, you can probably still see where the stubble begins and ends on each side. I guess these questions will require you to take out a ruler and everything, so I realize that most people won't feel like doing it! But thanks, anyway.1. How long is your pubic hair (stretched out, uncurled) if you keep it natural?2. How wide is your pubic hair patch across the top if you keep it natural?
-
Pubic hair survey
-
Anyone? No wonder it was an "afraid to ask" question.
-
i think that no one has replyed because no one here has a" au naturel" vagina. sorry!Ash
-
thank god for that lol hair is nasty
-
Well, that's your opinion. Personally, I think it's nasty if girls are completely shaven because it's just too pedophile looking for me. But to each their own. :wink:
-
And whats wrong with paedophiles?
-
Doesn't it seem like what's popular is whatever makes a woman look as much as possible like a girl?
-
Maybe its just a reminder of all the fun people had when they were young? The childish giddiness of doing sexual things for the first time...
-
No, it reminds people that young women are more fertile and healthy than older women are, and that if you mate, you have a better chance of producing healthy offspring with a younger women than with an older woman.That may have made sense when your relatives were roaming the African savannah; now it's just a useless artifact of our past. But fertility does diminish with age.
-
So what, nobody really cares about fertility, not conciously anyway.
-
What makes you think one woman is attractive and another isn't isn't a random accident. Some of it is hardwired in your brain, and it evolved to drive you to mate with the most fertile prospect(s). Your genes do not know about condoms.
-
Well, what does a pretty face gotta do with fertility? Or a good sense of humour?
-
nothing to do with looking fertile or like a girl or whatever- simply this: NO HAIR IS A HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE turn on... while bushes are turn-offs. Why fuck, finger, or eat a pussy thats hairy? thats gross- and u cant even see it really
-
because that's how God made it.... pfft. you kids are such dinks....I don't go all natural, but I think you are a rude prick if you say that a woman isn't lovable or sexable because she has some pubic hair....you're junk probably looks like a damn circus clown - a big curly mass... I suggest you check yourself.
-
I've been completely shaved for a while now, and I do it cos for me it feels better, not so i look like a girl (the suggestion freaks me out to be honest)
-
The issue I addressed was not what makes you feel better, but what men find attractive.
Women find certain things attractive in men, but the parameters are different.
If you like your hairstyle for one reason, and your man likes your hairstyle for another reason, then everybody still wins.
-
well my man certainly prefers me shaved, but not cos i look like a girl (i think if i suggested that he wouldn't be able to come near me again till it all grew back!!)
-
That may be perfectly true in his case, but I don't think most people sit around and analyze why they find certain characteristics to be attractive. In the social sciences it's hard to prove anything absolutely, but there's strong evidence that some of what we find attractive is hard-wired into our brains, and evolved to enhance our ability to promulgate our genes (in the environment that existed in pre-civilization times).
-
I didn't mean to start such a huge debate, but oh well.
-
How hairy? That like asking people how hary their arms are. It varies all over the place, and it's primarily a genetic thing. So taking a survey here might be amusing, but it won't really tell you much.Some people have thick, long patches; some have thin, sparse coverage.