For the potheads....

---

This argument is obviously going nowhere.How about a Mod just closes here? This thread has nothing to do with the topic anymore. Plus I'm tired of this fighting. Don't reply to this white_lines

I agree 100% with Insearch!

In reply to:No one "laces" weed moron, with other drugs at least. Who would put a mix expensive drug, like crack for instance, with bud, and then charge the same amount for it? No one, drug dealers know economics and they're some of the best entreprenuers. Some shitty weed has household chemicals such as Raid or Ajax on it, but it's extremely difficult not to notice something terribly wrong with the shit. Goodam freakin' idiot, some woman was arrested today in Miami for abandoning her kids so she could get her fix of crack-laced marijuana. At least that's what she claimed.You don't know what's in your pot unless you grow it yourself. The USDA doesn't inspect the stuff and certify its purity. Are you telling me it's unbelieveable that someone would lace their stuff with something and give it away? It sounds like something your own friends would do, when they're not electrocuting you. Anyone could buy dope with something extra and share it, and not mention the additional stuff.It reminds me of a ski trip, and the joint with the black dot...[To the would-be censors: stop bitching and move on to another thread.]

If everyone would quit commenting then the thread would finally die.

In reply to: Goodam freakin' idiot, some woman was arrested today in Miami for abandoning her kids so she could get her fix of crack-laced marijuana. At least that's what she claimed.You don't know what's in your pot unless you grow it yourself. The USDA doesn't inspect the stuff and certify its purity. Are you telling me it's unbelieveable that someone would lace their stuff with something and give it away? It sounds like something your own friends would do, when they're not electrocuting you. Anyone could buy dope with something extra and share it, and not mention the additional stuff.It reminds me of a ski trip, and the joint with the black dot... Weed costs roughly $10 a gram, crack is roughly $50. How could I dealer add even a small amount of rock to bud and still make a profit? He wouldn't, unless the customers wanted to purchase weed with crack and agreed to pay the higher price. And you can't compare all pot users to some crackhead welfare bitch in Florida.Before I but pot, I inspect the buds, examine the odor, etc. If somethings not right, I tell the dude to fuck off and I don't want it. Weed laced with other drugs is basicly a myth, weed is often sprayed with legal chemicals but no dealer is going to add crack to a bag and sell it for the same price. I used to hear back in 6th grade not to smoke pot because it can have LSD in it and kids smoked it and were committed to mental hospitals for the rest of their natural lives, bullshit, since for one, heat destroys LSD and two, you can't trip forever.The worst possible contaminant on my weed would be pesticide but then again I'm not anymore exposed to deadly chemicals from pot than I am from the other billions of sources that everyone encounters every day.Bottom line, you're misinformed and you just plain have no idea what you're talking about.

I know, but these two know-it-all's like to argue even though no one will EVER convince the other... so I guess it won't ever die.

Wow, it must be amazing to know EVERYTHING like you act like you do. Wow. rolls eyes grow up, your not fourteen anymore

I'm just tired of the name calling stuff. Its rather pointless. White- If its sprayed with Raid or whatever they use, isn't that still being 'laced with another chemical'? I still think its pretty screwed when people do it. Become a medical marijuana user. Grow your own green legally. Dont worry about anything. Ahh.. to be 18.

In reply to:Bottom line, you're misinformed and you just plain have no idea what you're talking about.Kid, you're giving me all this logic and reason why it wouldn't happen, and you might think that everyone is as anal as you are about inspecting their buds (even if they're totally stoned). The problem is that, in my relatively long life, I've seen weed spiked with other drugs, and its effect, so you're logic isn't worth a crap.What most annoys me about you is not that you think you know a lot of stuff that you don't, but that, if some teenager reads your nonsense and thinks you do know what you're talking about, he might do something dangerous and stupid. I don't care what kind of stupid crap you do to yourself...just don't take other people with you.That's why I think your posts rate a response. It's not because the topic or the poster is so fascinating.

Then whoever you have seen selling weed laced with other illegal drugs, most likely costing much more than marijuana had a lot of money and didn't care about losing profit, or he is obviously not a good dealer and is no longer in business. It doesn't take close inspecting to see if weed's laced, if it is laced and you couldn't tell by touching and smelling the buds, then there isn't enough of whatever is on it to do any actual harm. Smoking windex, while certainly not healthy won't just make you drop dead on the spot.

i would smoke an oz in a day but where im from a oz cost $160 and i cant aford to pay that much so i usally smoke a few grams a day.

meet someone with connects to the city. city weed is cheaper cause thats where the bulk comes from, you can get an oz. of bud that normally sells for $200 for like $100-120. Its such a good deal you cant aford not to.

i don't see where Steve can even be coming from due to the fact he doesn't smoke.

BOTTOM LINE, weed does not affect driving, at all. and that's coming from somebody who has lived around pot and has been involved with it throughout all my teenage and adult years.

> i don't see where Steve can even be coming from due to the fact he doesn't smoke.

I rarely drink and never drive drunk, but I'll posit that driving drunk is not a good idea.

> BOTTOM LINE, weed does not affect driving, at all. and that's coming from somebody who has lived around pot and has been involved with it throughout all my teenage and adult years.

Bottom line, you make the claim, you prove it. Prove that everyone who smokes can drive OK. I have smoked pot, and I can tell you that, for me, any task that required sustained concentration would suffer when I was high. I sure as hell wouldn't want to be faced with an emergency situation while behind the wheel, especially where an accident hung on a difference of a small fraction of a second in reaction time.

The idea that "weed does not affect driving, at all" sounds ridiculous. That's a pretty absolute statement. Do you have any laboratory data to back that up? If you do, we might be able to get pot removed from the list of intoxicants under the DUI laws.

im smoked and driven for years, it just causes me to make unscheduled detours to krispy kream.

I rarely drink and never drive drunk, but I'll posit that driving drunk is not a good idea.alcohol and pot give you two very different highs>Bottom line, you make the claim, you prove it. Prove that everyone who smokes can drive OK. I have smoked pot, and I can tell you that, for me, any task that required sustained concentration would suffer when I was high. I sure as hell wouldn't want to be faced with an emergency situation while behind the wheel, especially where an accident hung on a difference of a small fraction of a second in reaction timefaced with an emergancy situation any time is bad, and you can equally get the same result sober. the whole concept of your argument is stupid>The idea that "weed does not affect driving, at all" sounds ridiculous. That's a pretty absolute statement. Do you have any laboratory data to back that up? If you do, we might be able to get pot removed from the list of intoxicants under the DUI laws.of course they are not going to have data pro-pot, common sense.

> faced with an emergancy situation any time is bad, and you can equally get the same result sober. the whole concept of your argument is stupid

WTF? Some of my friends insist that they drive as well or better when they're drunk compared to when they're sober. I'm not saying that being drunk is the same as being high. I'm saying that they are as misguided as you are.

> of course they are not going to have data pro-pot, common sense.

Who the hell is "they"? It doesn't take a million-dollar laboratory to measure the impairment to reflexes and quick decision making that being high might cause.

Your belief is subjective. In fact it's a religious belief. In fact, it's completely worthless.

It's idiots like you that poison the argument every time a good case is made for the legalization of marijuana.

>WTF? Some of my friends insist that they drive as well or better when they're drunk compared to when they're sober. I'm not saying that being drunk is the same as being high. I'm saying that they are as misguided as you are.

what does that tell you? the majority of people who are high do not have a higher chance of getting into a wreck.

>who the hell is "they"?

you said scientific data, jackass. i was going by what you said.

>It doesn't take a million-dollar laboratory to measure the impairment to reflexes and quick decision making that being high might cause.

what does it take? i guarantee you if you surveyed 1000 regular pot smokers, all of them will tell you it does not affect anything they do. your not getting it through the thick head of yours. the only people making this stupid argument of yours are stuck up idiots who are trying to follow a righteous path. your oblivious to what commercials and truth.com have brainwashed you with.

>Your belief is subjective. In fact it's a religious belief. In fact, it's completely worthless.

to each his own.

>It's idiots like you that poison the argument every time a good case is made for the legalization of marijuana.

LOL! now you're being hypocritical. your arguing against pot, then going for it.

> what does that tell you? the majority of people who are high do not have a higher chance of getting into a wreck.

Are you saying that being stoned doesn't impair your reflexes and reaction as much as being drunk does? I'll go along with that. Does that make driving while stoned a good idea?

I am not against pot, got it? I'm not arguing against alcohol or gun ownership either.

Just don't get drunk and drive anwhere near me and don't point your loaded gun ant me, and I'll be happy. Until you can demonstrate that driving while stoned is safe, don't do that anywhere near me either.

If you had even a passing familiarity with science, you'd understand that surveying pot smokers on how they think their stoned driving is isn't worth anything at all.

I think marijuana should be legal. Period. But irresponsible potheads like you screw up the possibility of it happening any time soon. It's a poitical process, and you're sabotaging it.

But I don't think driving while impaird should be legal, whether the impairment is from alcohol, sedatives, pot, lack of sleep, or anything else.

Dude smoking pot for me does affect me. Thats like saying i would do just as good as if i played a football game high, and i can back that up becuz my dumbass went to a basketball practice high and o man did i do horrible. Im not against pot but it does affect you