Just a little curious.

---

I was reading a thread about circumsision. When my children were about to be born, I FOUGHT to not circumsize them if they were boys. Both were girls, so that ended it all.

I was wondering, if others are of the same opinion (or experience) as me, that uncircumsized men are more gentle sexually than circimsized ones. I almost feel like leaving the head exposed makes it less sensitive so sex is rougher because they don't feel it as much? I am not saying that ALL sex with one or the other is always rough or gentle, just uncircumsized guys seem to be able to be MORE gentle.

Maybe Im wacked, but I never claimed not to be. :grin:

Personally I dont know, but my friend thinks the same thing. Her first was cut, and was very rough. Her current bf is uncut, and she says he's much more gentle. So maybe you guys are right, or maybe the circumcised guys were just assholes.

I don't think there is anything to this. I'm quite certain research would not find any correlation between cut status and gentleness.

I seriously don't think there is a psychological difference between cut and uncut guys.Actually, after doing a little research, cut guys are far less likely to get infections relating to the penis. I dunno, just a thought... Lata, H.

You can't answer this objectively damien. You're not on the receiving end.As for the differences? Just ask korydon. I'm sure he can give you a ton of evidence. To be honest with you, I do get sore if I go at it too hard... so yeah there is some truth to it I'm sure.eminem: What do infection rates have anything to do with this?

In reply to:

---

I'm quite certain

---

I'm not sure why you're so certain. You may be right, but you might be wrong.

The original poster is making a generalization, but some generalizations have a basis in statistics (e.g., Americans drive large cars. It doesn't mean that all Americans drive large cars.)

Infection rates have to do with this because it may be the difference between him being cut or uncut. That is an issue that you would need to think about.

A lot of girls like it rougher anyway

LMAO...I never said that I didn't like it rough sometimes...nor did I ask about the infection thing, a dirty penis is a dirty penis, cut or not...eeeeewwwwww!

Just wondering about the differences in sensitivity...since the head is always exposed in a cut man, and protected in an uncut man. :grin: AND if it seems that uncuts are usually more gentle or if it's just been MY experience?

i think it all depends on the mood im uncut and i guess it could go either way like if i was letting off steam or just doing it for the pleasure off it i think i would be doing it diffrently

I am circumcised and can be both gental and careing as well as (like any man) want some good rough pig sex once in a while. The biggest difference, as far as hygien goes, is that an uncircumcised male must take the extra time in ensuring that he cleans under the forskin as to make sure there is no nasties going on under that flap of skin.

cleary there is pros n cons. im am uncircumsised and u have to clean it more carefully and even after u clean it the smell doesnt go. i literally have to scrub it with a rough surface for a couple minutes and liquid soap works for me. i heard we get more pleasure and my masturbations used to feel like heaven. i dont do much anymore cuz lately my dick has been hurting like hell when i do it.