Bush needs to take avasive action and bomb north korea to dust. If we dont take em' out now In one quik hit WWIII will be here.
Bush Bush Go Bush...... :open_mouth:
-
North Korea
-
Genious!
-
I was having doubts about you quite a few posts ago, but now it's pretty clear: You're trolling.
-
Magnificent.
-
I see a flaw. If we bomb North Korea, nuke them, absolutely level the country, then pretty much the rest fo the world that has any military will attack us, and there will be WWIII. I have, with your permission, expanded your original plan. I think we should deploy our Nuclear arsenal in all directions, sparing only North America. Once the rest of the worlds inhabitnts have been destroyed, we can truly be masters of the globe, and as the population of America swells to exceed its boundries, we can then lease or sell these newly aquired properties to those of this population increase.
-
sure, except GW make poopies in his panties when he thinks of taking on someone with real weapons
-
No, Because everyone is against n korea besides Iraq and Iran, So only 3 countries to nuke
-
Someone IM'ed me and asked: "What the hell is Trolling?" I'll let dictionary.com do all the work.
In reply to:
troll: An electronic mail message, Usenet posting or other
(electronic) communication which is intentionally incorrect,
but not overtly controversial (compare flame bait), or the
act of sending such a message. Trolling aims to elicit an
emotional reaction from those with a hair-trigger on the reply
key. A really subtle troll makes some people lose their
minds.Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, (c) 1993-2005 Denis Howe
In reply to:
troll: v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To
utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable
responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase
"trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream
"trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a
likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post
that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look
even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to
the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate
troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See
also YHBT. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1;
regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a
newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to
annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by
the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic
at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly
creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming
characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of
life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." 3.
[Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS
students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab
policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves
lurking in dark cavelike corners.Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower
category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing
some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See
also Troll-O-Meter.Source: Jargon File 4.2.0
In reply to:
flame bait: n. [common] A posting intended to trigger a flame
war, or one that invites flames in reply. See also troll.Source: Jargon File 4.2.0
-
I dont need that detailed def.
-
Well, in case other people are interested, there it is.If the U.S. incinerated North Korea (which would take South Korea and other friendly places with it), don't you think that China might respond by incinerating the western half of the U.S.? Maybe including the Midwest?
-
Don't forget that we have also made war talk against Sryia.They also do not seem to understand that they are posting with humans and that these humans have feelings. Trolls never can be reasoned with, either, and are impervious to all but being ignored. They seek attention to amuse themselves with their maliciousness.I have lost my mind along time ago.
-
Fuck we would kick everyeones asses but we'd lose alot of lives in the process
-
If we lobbed around enough nuclear bombs to kick everybody's ass, things would get pretty radioactive. But a nuclear winter might be a good counterbalance to global warming.I thought Christians aren't supposed to want to kill everyone.
-
Well if its a life or death sit.
-
We need to take out 3 countries and well be fine besides for al quedaCountries as fowlows, Iraq, Iran, North Korea
-
That's brilliant. Which terrorists came from any of those countries? Al Qaida doens't seem to have much presence in any of them, except maybe Iraq, thanks to the U.S. invasion.What about Saudi Arabia? Most of the 9/11 terrorists came from there. And Pakistan provided nuclear technology to Iran. And Russia is still a danger. But China beats them all. Shouldn't China be blown up?
-
You know what go fuck urself
-
Aw, c'mon, you didn't answer the question. Why do you want to blow up coutries that didn't attack us, but you don't want to blow up countries whose citizens have attacked us? President Bush and his family are personally close to the Saudi royal family. But those guys are spreading a hateful, anti-American form of Islam around the Middle East and other places in the world. And most of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia. What do you make of that?Not everything can be summed up in one sentence.
-
First of all It will happen, North Korea The most dangerous threat on earth as of now, Iraq is third, Iran is second, all need to be taken out.
-
Forget about. It isn't going to happen, unless someone makes a videogame about it, and you can blow up Iran on your Playstation. But not in reality.
So as a Christian, you don't care about all of the innocent people who would die in a nuclear attack? You'd even damage people who are not gay. Wouldn't that be bad? You don't care about the radioactive clouds that would blow over the U.S. and contaminate our soil?
What makes you think Iran is so dangerous? Have you been reading up on the Middle East situation? Why don't you think Pakistan is even a lot more dangerous than Iran? Why aren't you troubled by the fact that most of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia, and that our president's family has friendly relationships with their dictators? Even though they were totally uncooperative when all those U.S. Marines were killed in a terrorist attack there in the 80's?
Anyway, the U.S. is not going to drop nuclear bombs on any of those countries.
