My rantings on a little incident

---

Hey all..When I was about 13-14 years old and I was headed home after delivering my newspapers, I encountered a cat next to my house's garage. I started petting it and enjoying the moment, feeling the warmth and closeness of another living being. It was real playful too, and kind a hopped up on my lab and starting stroking my chin with it's face, signalling it liked my strokings. All very normal. But then I kind a started imagening that I had a sensual relationsship with the cat, y'know as if the strokings and touches between me and the cat were sensual. Mind you I imagined, I pretended, I was well aware that this was not the case. I kind a made the same expressions as if it was a woman in the cats place, and the same expressions as you might have had with a woman in the same situation. It was a play, a game, and I was offcourse aware of this.Then I took the cat,positioned it in front of me and pretended I took it from behind. I made sexual movements towards it from behind, with my nether region. But without touching it in any way, other than my hands that held it where it was.Again a play, a game with no seriousness. After perhaps 10-20 seconds it became annoyed at being held fast, bit my wrist, and then ran away. I said something like "dirt critter!" and then walked inside. When I look back at it I wasn't really entitled to call it a dirt critter. I understand why it bit me.Anyhow, A few years go by and then I look back at it and wonder "what was that"? why did I do such a thing? what was the point? I have come to the conclusion that the touch and warmth/closeness of the cat awoke my needs and desires towards women (as I am a heterosexual), and those needs projected itself on what awoke it - the cat. So what uncounsously happened, was that I imagined that the cat was a woman, and then pretended that I did whatever my desires and needs required. Being close to the woman, having sex with her etc. So the whole game/play was actually a projection of my needs and desires when it comes to women. Funny, huh?Have any of you ever experienced anything like this? I read a post in here about a guy who dryhumped a dog, and it makes a lot of sense to me. Well, not dryhumping an animal but the whole thing behind. We're very sexual beings, that's no secret, and when no other playmate so to speak is around, then I guess it's natural for young teenagers to project the sexual interest and curiosity on some close creature they've already more or less bonded with. Say,a pet! That not meaning that they go fuck 'em or anything, not at all. Just thatthey may at some point pretend thay have sex with a pet, just for fun, just because they're bored whatever. I'm talking about young teenagers pretending they have sex with an animal, due to their sexual energy and needs and desires towards the opposite sex, which become projected on a living being they're alot around.Sorry if this has become too psychological, like the last thing I wrote.Anyhow, have you ever done that? pretended you had sex with an animal or pet, by pretending you took them from behind, or dryhumped them? Because you were horny, bored playful,whatever?

... ... ...

Between this and the "Animals turn me on!" thread, I've never seen anyone make such a big deal over such a small thing. You are absolutely obsessed (if word count is any indication). I hope you don't spend too many of your waking hours mulling over your relationship with animals, when you could instead be doing your math homework. I suggest you set this aside, take some psychology and anthropology courses, then come back to it in the future. Seriously, you're not likely to get any great insight on this message board. You do have the option to discuss it with a psychotherapist; perhaps someone who gets paid to analyze such issues would be a better bet.

I can see your point and I agree.

But dont make such a big deal of it in that sense. Just answer an innocent question: Have you ever pretended to have sex with an animal as I've described it?
Just to find out if I'm the only one so to speak.
No big psychology thread, just yes or no answers, that's all.

To the guy who first replied to this thread: What do you mean? please elaborate.

It looks like you won't be dissuaded. To answer the question you directed at me: No. Do people sometimes anthropomorphize animal or objects in a sexual way? Yes, it's very common. It's called a fetish.

You are correct in your statement on fetishes. But it has nothing to do with my question, OR this case. I'm not talking about fetishes, or sexual addictions to objects, or animals if you want to call it that. I'm talking about a PROJECTION. Something very natural, expressing itself through such an incident as I've described it. That meaning needs and desires from young teenagers, when it comes to women. It's a game, a play with no reality bonded to it, between the human and animal, but it's a projection of the teenagers needs and desires towards sex with women. Comprende? Not a fetish. It's not an zoophilac tendency, it's not like it's about the animal, it's about the women.Yet again you misunderstand me. Maybe it's my fault, maybe it's yours. Just because animals are involved you think it's about sexual addiction to animals. It's not. And you would know that, if you'd take the time to read between the lines.

Sounds like high-falutin' fancy talk for a fetish, but I could easily be missing your very subtle, recondite, abstruse issue. But I were going to read between the lines of a piece of literature, I'd read Sartre or Albee.

If it was a fetish, SteveA, it would've been more than just one insignificant incidence, dont you think? Or I would've been turned on by thinking about pretending to have sex with an animal. I'm not. Simple as that. I thought this case through, and found what there was to found. That it was a symbolic of my needs and desires towards women. Nothing more. This thread is a question towards the people on this board, a question if I'm the only one that have ever done that, for that reason. It's nothing big. Your posts is beginning to feel more and more like a personal attack on me, and clearly you don't understand what I'm talking about in these threads. Either because I'm not describing it good enough, or just because you don't want to understand. Please stop your sarcasm, and post something useful. If you dont have anything useful to say, dont say nothin' at all.

I've diagnosed your issue: You take yourself far too seriously, and you think that folks here will take the time to plow through your long essays on some subtle, obscure personality quirk that few would dwell on even if it were their own experience. I may be wrong about the second part, but so far you are batting zero.
Have you researched Asperger's Syndrome?

Well, why don't explain it to me. Don't think I dont take you serious SteveA, I do. You seem to be a very intelligent person, with something on your mind. But you can jump to wrong conclusions too quickly.

I am taking myself too serious I know. And perhaps I am being naive when it comes to the people on this board, perhaps they really dont wanna answer to a thread that most see as insignificant and well, nothing serious. But I am kind a dissapointed that they will not give help when asked of it, and only seem to wanna answer when they themselves can relate to it, or have a opinion beforehand.
Like the thread on the guy eating shit for exampel.

Don't think I dont take you serious SteveA, I do.There's your first mistake. Never take me seriously.> I am taking myself too serious I know. And perhaps I am being naive when it comes to the people on this board, perhaps they really dont wanna answer to a thread that most see as insignificant and well, nothing serious.Obscure and hard to understand and figure out do not necessarily mean "insignificant".> But I am kind a dissapointed that they will not give help when asked of it, and only seem to wanna answer when they themselves can relate to it, or have a opinion beforehand.I'm sure it's nothing personal, but you have to realize the orientation of this message board, and the fact that you're not paying anything, and thus have no right to demand that people address your issues. We had this discussion a while ago. Have you searched elsewhere for answers?I may be missing the point of your postings, but it sounds like one of many, many minor things in one's life, flowing by like water in a river. I don't understand why you choose to think of it as a defining issue, but like I said, I could be missing something. If I were an analyst, I'd do a meta-analysis on why you think the issue you described is such a major thing, before I'd address the issue itself.> Like the thread on the guy eating shit for exampel.Huh? As I said to someone else, get a clue, dude. The shit-eating troller who posted that item was not looking for any kind of answers. He was trying to evoke a reaction, and he succeeded. He's undoubtedly very satisfied, if he ever came back to the site. If you don't understand that, then you are in serious need of a reality check.

Hey, relax SteveA.. I'm well aware that it was a troll (or I'm convinced that it was). I just meant that the thread got a huge attention from the board members, because it was something they could relate to (they thought it was disgusting).Anyhow, yes I take such little things as this too serious, I know. It's a mental slip from my side. And I AM working on it. The purpose of my postings here, was too shed some light on the cases, too see it from different angles and get people opinions. I achieved that, although I seem to be a bit unfit to describe such matters. People here doesnt seem to understand jackshit of what I'm saying.Anyhow, I think I got this covered myself. I just wanted to be sure I wasn't on a sidetrack. Did'nt recieve as much as I hoped for here, but then again nobody objected to my theories, so I can only hope that that means they found them reasonable or possible. Btw, thanks for the reply SteveA.

Btw, what was Aspergers syndrome? Not an insult on me, I hope...