It's no use.This guy gets a bug up his ass that he's right and even though he doesn't get it, he'll argue till the end of time that he's right. He's convinced that the forskin when stretched out is thick. It just isn't.He's wrong and we all know it.
-
What do girls think of uncut penises?
-
To Ineligible: Thank you so much for explaining that to me. I had no idea. Glad to learn something new. Because of that and it's now the afternoon and not the middle of the night before a test, I can now understand GPMY's post. Originally Posted By: GrownPastMyYearsthen why did that happen? the loss of girth... he was really pissed off and when he asked the doctor he said that it was because of the "tight circumsition" and also that he had alot of extra foreskin.Perhaps he doesn't know how to properly measure himself and he (like you) was gullible enought to believe that the loss of foreskin decreases girth. Or maybe he misunderstood the doctor. I have trouble believing a urologist would foolishly tell a patient that having a circumcision would decrease a man's girth. And if he really, really did, then his ass needs to be fired. Originally Posted By: GrownPastMyYearsprove it to me...We're trying, but you're refusing to believe us...again. Originally Posted By: GrownPastMyYearsif u have an excess amount of foreskin, and the reason why your girth is as thick as it is, is because of the extra amount of foreskin. then YEA its going to be thicker dumbass more skin = more coverageI think you don't even know the vocabulary to male parts and it's seriously causing you some major confusion.Do you know what girth is? It's the circumference of the thickest part of the shaft. The foreskin is what protects the glans. It doesn't go all the way to the base of the penis. So, it doesn't matter how much foreskin you have, it doesn't make a different in your girth because they are in TWO VERY DIFFERENT areas. Sdp even said it in simple terms: Originally Posted By: sdpThe forskin attaches to the shaft just behind the head, so if you are measuring near the middle of the shaft, there is only one layer of skin there whether you are cut or not, erect or flaccid. The skin is not doubled up anywhere except on the glans when flaccid or if you are unable to retract when erect. Originally Posted By: GrownPastMyYearswith extra foreskin on a uncircumsized penis its going to be thicker because theres more room for the blood to fill the shaft as well as the fact that its basically a cover... Sorry man, wrong again. More skin doesn't mean more blood. Blood vessels carry blood, not skin. Originally Posted By: GrownPastMyYearshe's not trying to get the story straight, he's saying im lieing. This is the second time you've accused Rad of calling you liar. Please, where in his post did he tell you that? You're once again assuming what he's telling you. Originally Posted By: weloveaction69hey ASSFUCK no need to get Bitchy they're just trying to get your story straight,its not our fault you cant communicate to the rest of the world, Sweetie, I know you're new here, which is more reason to not already to start with the mindless name calling.---Yes, an uncut penis has more skin, in length. But that doesn't make the girth any larger, period. Absorb what you've learn, swallow your pride when you're wrong, and move on.
-
can i post example pictures on here to show you guys what im talking about, a cousin of mine did a health project in college about the difference between a circ penis and an uncirc, and i think if i look hard enough i can find the pictures...
-
Quote:about the difference between a circ penis and an uncircLol, we know the difference between a cut and uncut penis.
-
And there's still no difference in circumference.....
-
it was a community college, and the project was about ALL the differences in it, he took pictures of himself with his extra foreskin, and then pulled the foreskin tight down, measuring the difference... it was slight, but still a difference,
-
Please save yourself the trouble and don't. There's so many wrong things with that, that I'm bored enough to list them all:
-
It's simple, basic, logical fact. Foreskin does not equal more girth.
-
Why in the world would you have or want to have pictures of your cousin's penis?
-
Your cousin "research" doesn't seem to have merit. Are you telling me all he did was take pictures of his penis, measure, and that's it?
-
In order for your cousin to have thoroughly studied this false myth, you need more than one guy and include both cut and uncut men. One man isn't "research".
There's nothing wrong with being wrong. Swallow your pride and let's all move on.
-
-
First of all, once enough intimacy has been established that one may be seeing your penis, it should not be an issue. I have seen circumcisions performed and it is barbaric! Any time a male infant is born into my family, I beg for the child to not be mutilated. My own son was born before I went to nursing school, so he is circumcised, but knowing what I know now I regret that I put him through such horrible agony for no good reason. Anyway, back to my original point, as relationships progress toward sex, these things really do not matter so much. And if you move quickly and don'testablish intimacy before sex, you probably won't care what they think anyway.
-
Finally Back on topic. Yes what you said is true but I actually know some girls who prefer or just find it sexier to see a Circumcised man than Uncircumcised. So that alone might even make a difference into a person's decision. So I have yet to see a woman respond on the topic of which would girls prefer.I even I would like to know the answer to that. I'm uncut and I'm planning on staying that way. I like to be All-Natural lol.
-
It is all in what your used to seeing.Another thread gave me this annalogy. Do you find it odd to see a woman with a bald head? What if EVERY woman shaved her head, would you find it odd if you saw one with long hair?hmmm...