Ok... well im 14 and im like 5ft 5in and i have a 6-6.25 inch long and 4.5-4.75 inch girth. I think it looks really small... Is that normal all the porn i watch lol everyones dick looks so much bigger. And would a condom fit normall with that kinda girth? I think my penis looks kinda thin as well as short.
-
Penis SIZe
-
o yea... and um i just hit puberty about 6 months ago over the summer. if that helps any.
-
Your penis is a little over average in length for an adult, and your girth is very close to adult average (and is likely to get a bit thicker). So you're not small at all. Porn actors are chosen for their big dicks because people find it more erotic, and because it's technically easier to do the filming if there's a bit more length. Porn actors are usually advertised as being much bigger than they really are, however.Don't forget that you see your penis from above, and other people's from the side, which makes it look bigger. (Many porn pictures use angles that make it look even bigger.) Have a look at yours in the mirror from the side and notice the difference.With your girth a regular condom should fit fine.
-
Yeah considering the fact that you just hit puberty recently, your girth should start shooting up in measurement toward your later years.
-
Um like i was saying along time ago....i think 6 inches is no longer gonna be average for an adult anymore....That was a long time ago....and i do think people are a little bigger now....maybe it needs to be moved up to 6 1/2 or 7......i think people's only saying 6 inches so the small people won't kill themselfs....and really....was the 6 inches thing made up 50 years ago?? i think it might need to change now....kids are kinda bigger in size than they used to be along time ago
-
and cuz it seems like we're having alot alot alot of 12 year olds "a little bigger than the average adult"....and really i doubt anyone just saying they're 6 1/2 is lying.......
-
first off dont even think about worrying...your 14...u may think your a 'big kid' now...but in in another 4 years when your 18 you will laugh at yourself for even worrying...
plus the porn your watching has people at least 10 years older then you...so dont worry about it...you have alot of growing left.
and i would not agree at all to say 6.5 to 7 is average...first off ive heard many many times 5.5-6 is average...and i agree with that.
-
In reply to:
Um like i was saying along time ago....i think 6 inches is no longer gonna be average for an adult anymore....That was a long time ago....and i do think people are a little bigger now....maybe it needs to be moved up to 6 1/2 or 7.
And where exactly did you get that idea? That's absurd.
And as for your statemtent about 12 year olds with dicks larger than the average adults, that is better explained by the fact that a lot of young kids lie about the size of their dicks. A young kid with a 4 1/2 inch penis might very well lie and say 6 1/2. That's a whole 2 inch difference!
-
That information wasn't "made" up and is the result of studies that were done. There are going to be guys with smaller or larger penises than the average all the time. Just remember that guys lie about the size of their penis (don't know why we think it being bigger is so important) so unless you see that 12 year old with his erect 7 inche penis - you can almost know he's lying about it.....
-
i am 14 2 and im just 7' erect and a girth of 5inches so ur not small much the same as me pornstars are hired becoz of there big dicks u r about average
-
well for one thing, i can almost gaureentee this day's generation's bodys are a little different from 50 years ago.....people's faces look much diff. now than the pics you see of people a long time ago.....and i think people are slightly taller now.....just it's possible for people's bodies in general to change slight appearance over generations....and so can average size...
-
That is completely absurd. Humans don't evolve nearly that quickly. If you took a contemporary American, took some weight off him, and dressed in a 50's outfit and gave him a 40's haircut, he'd be indistinguishable from a 50's person. If you took someone from the 40's and gave her a new outfit and haircut, she'd look just like any other person on the street.
People are somewhat taller (for environmental reasons), and rather heavier (for behavioral reasons). It seems logical that penis size would track body size, and it may be true...or not. There's not much data on the subject.
-
Yea I mean, back 1900's - 1950's people worked in feilds...and did hard labor.....prolly the enviroment affected their growth.....don't know how....but prolly did....(and really the 6 inches thing....really im very sure that people's penis's get smaller as you pass your 30's)...like how people get shorter after they hit 30.....im sure your penis hits its top lenght at about 18 -25 and prolly shrinks some after that....so if you take a average of like 25 - 30 year olds....chances are they could be a little less smaller than like at 20 - 25 year old.....
-
Genetics aside, people's diets have a lot to do with their size.> really im very sure that people's penis's get smaller as you pass your 30'sI'm really curious to learn where you came up with this idea. When people get old (a lot older than their 30's), they can lose bone mass, which will lead to a loss of height if their spine squishes down. I don't see how that would affect penis size in any way.
-
I'm sorry but I'd have to agree with everybody else on the penis size thing. As a rugby player (and attendee of WILD parties!) I've seen a lot of erect penises being measured over the past 10 years or so (I'm 25 now) and the vast majority of them were considerably less than 7 inches in length.It's perfectly possible that your penis is 7 inches in length but this is NOT the norm. I know 2 blokes with huge penises (1 is 19 now, the other's 22) and both of them were (or claim to have been, which is believable given their size now) more than 7 inches in length when they were your age. But of all the 100+ erect penises that I've seen, I doubt that more than 10% were bigger than 7 inches (I don't know exactly how many I've seen nor all the sizes).
-
In reply to:I'm sorry but I'd have to agree with everybody else on the penis size thing. Actually, you are pretty much agreeing with "everybody else". It's only one, very young person who is saying otherwise. In reply to: I've seen a lot of erect penises being measured over the past 10 years or so I didn't realize that was such an integral part of all those wild rugby parties. Who knew what we were missing!
-
As a guy in his late 40's I definitely disagree with the statement that the penis shrinks after age 30. Mine is not any shorter (or longer for that matter) than it was once I reached my mature length (around 20 or 21 for me). Also, I agree, the difference in the look of our faces and those of the 1900's is because most of us are pretty obese compared to them. Your right, their hard work affected them. It made them stronger, heathier, and less fat than us lazy couch potatoes that sit at desks all day. My Grandfather's arm strenth in his 80's would put most guys of today to shame. He grew up farming with mules and by hand.
-
I've seen a serious survey somewhere that did seem to indicate older guys (over 60) were a bit smaller - that could be a result of lower testosterone, perhaps just meaning older guys aren't quite as horny. It wasn't a large effect.People are taller now because of better nutrition, but modern surveys don't support the idea that adults (at least) are also more hung. It may be, however, that guys are attaining adult development sooner.Some people have suggested that food containing oestrogens, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the environment, should mean guys are getting smaller.There's also been inflation of the inch in general talk on the Net.
-
It may be, however, that guys are attaining adult development sooner.I dunno...someone did a serious analysis of the statistics recently, and found no real evidence of it, even though it seems like kids are starting puberty earlier.
-
I remember that, though as I recall it was mainly talking about the development of girls, where the first period provides a much more definite time-mark, and it was shown that the dramatic changes that had been claimed weren't justified. Slower changes are still possible.I've read that in J.S. Bach's church choir the boys' voices didn't break until about 19. That was a time when northern European agriculture wasn't very productive.