Agenda?

---

I'm really, really confused. But I think that I confused sombody by my marriage rant. This is what I ment if you are married and believe that gay marriage is wrong then your a hypocrite because, marriage was ment for two pure people but you still got married so why can't I if you beleive it's a sin. Which I don't.

For the record, I would like to point out, that upon clarification from the man himself in another thread, if it hasn't already been covered, (I'll see if I can find the thread/post), thor is against the SIN part, not the loving part. i.e. The whole sodomy thing, not love/etc.

Originally Posted By: deek marriage was ment for two pure people What does that mean? Pure how? Virgins?

It means that unless you are with out sin the your marriage isn't sactumed by God. In my opinion. Will I still get married? Yes I will

Guess I won't be getting married then.

Originally Posted By: deekIt means that unless you are with out sin the your marriage isn't sactumed by God. In my opinion.So, in other words, most marriages, including yours, won't be legit in the eyes of God. Only "pure" people can marry. But yet, you still chose to, even though it won't be a marriage according to your opinion.I'm confused.

Originally Posted By: deekIt means that unless you are with out sin then your marriage isn't sanctioned by God. In my opinion. That's funny. Because if your opinion is right, then no ones marriage is sanctioned. One thing I retained from school: Everyone is born a sinner, due to Adam and Eve's original sin. Funny how things work, isn't it?

Originally Posted By: thorIt's the behavior, the homosexual sex, that is the issue. That, and the idea that gays think they can change the definition of marriage. Okay, the whole sex thing, I get, like I've/you've said before. But with the marriage thing, that I understand too, becuase it's been defined by law, definition, so on and so forth, as a "sacred union between man and woman". I get that. But what I want to know, is why you [more in general, opposition] can't compromise, and make the word/phrase Union, or Civil Union, simply saying that it's all the rights afforded to married straight couples? I mean, it could say something like "This document grants John and Rick/Jane and Sally the same rights that John and Jane have when they get married." Is it really that simple? Just the semantics? Well, not semantics, but you understand?

That whole thing is just to get to Christians who beleive in the sanctaty of marriage. I still believe that you should get married though. I'm just saying that if you believe that gay marriage isn't sanctuned by God than nether is yours.

Obviously, this topic cannot be resolved. Neither side is going to back down...