Freeballing

---

how many of you guys freeball?

what's that?

In reply to: wear ZERO underwear, and just have pants/shorts on with nothing underneath, thats my extent of knowlage on freeballing Yuck! I can't imagine doing that. Too much rubbing. Too much looseness. And where are those little dribbles to go then, after pissing?I would rather go around naked, than do that. Sleeping naked is cooler. I can't imagine putting on pants, without underwear first. Yuck!But I do like boxers, as they aren't too restrictive.

if u think about it..boxers are the pretty close to the same as free balling it....thing bout it...boxers are shorts that are thin material a lil shorter..and the crotch is usually not as long as pants/shorts....I personally don't free ball it, but i highly doubt that it would bother me...but i dunno bout other people.

i do at night in PJs. if i'm not sleeping in boxers. during the day no. i wear underwear

at night sometimes i go naked, but freeballing sucks with athletic shorts cause sometimes if your laying down and lift your leg up some they come down and your balls would be hangin out.

I free ball on occasion....other than that, its boxers or whatever i feel like wearing.....but sleeping naked is the only way!"smile it don't hurt...I promise!"

I put my man in that habit. And for all you thinking somethings wrong with it, think of this. Easy access to the region for a girl when a quick-e is needed. My man started and he won't go back.

In reply to:

---

if u think about it..boxers are the pretty close to the same as free balling it....thing bout it...boxers are shorts that are thin material a lil shorter..and the crotch is usually not as long as pants/shorts....I personally don't free ball it, but i highly doubt that it would bother me...but i dunno bout other people.

---

No, boxers partially contain the penis, even if they don't restrict it all that much. Boxes keep the penis from rubbing around inside the pants, or flopping around. And help catch those inevitable dribbles after urinating.

Perhaps, trying to consider your view, boxers are a "compromise" between no under wear, and those boring, perhaps too restrictive "tighty whities" or briefs. I don't like my underwear too tight up on me. And jock straps or penis cups are the ridiculous extreme confinement, except where they might be needed temporarily like for sports.

Boxers are also good, because they don't excessively restrict growing erections. They can give and let the penis extend and swell where it needs to go, requiring less quick or subtile "adjustments."

I always sleep naked, but I start with white or gray briefs when I dress for the day. It's partly just habit, but in my mid-40s, briefs still feel sexy to me, and my wife hates seeing me in boxers. (I know, because I once had a horrible case of jock itch, and my dermatologist made me wear boxers for four weeks while his magic potions did their work. My wife took one look at me the first night and laughed. "Lose 'em," was her advice. I tried freeballing the next day, and liked it even less. My pants kept rubbing my penis, and after the first pleasant tingle wore off, it got to be merely bothersome.) I have a theory about men's underwear preferences--that we wear what our dads didn't. Freud would say it's oedipal. I think it's just generational. When I was a kid, dads wore boxers, so we all wore briefs. Now, boys raised by dads in briefs have gone back to boxers. My two teens have, and so have a majority of the under-30 guys at my gym. I haven't been able to fit boxer-briefs into my hypothesis yet, but freeballing is probably the ultimate form of rebellion, not just against dads but against all the rulemakers. Hey, young brothers, whatever turns you on--you'll all be raising boys wearing briefs.

all the time when i was little, but now just when i sleep

Dude... 2 year old thread. Please pay attention to the dates when responding.

who cares if this is old but all the time. It's so comfy with shorts on. But wait... why in gods name would you guys have 2 year old threads. Why not purge them?

alot of shit gets answered on this site. alot of people discover this site from googles cache. Those old threds are still valid, they still have good info in them, why delete them ?it helps people find the site, and alot of questions prolly go unasked by stumbling on them in the old threads.It is ok to revive an old thread if you have relevant information like new break thrus or some outstanding shit to add.If more people used search to go thru the old threads, alot of the current questions that have been asked a million times would get them teh answers they seek alot faster.

Yeah, why not reply to old threads?

99% of the time the new post is something useless like "Yeah!" or "Gross!", or in answer to someone who has long since disappeared. Often, new threads get buried quickly, sometimes before they've received any reply.[Too bad Pronatalist and f22fighter aren't still around...they were fun.]

i freeball sometimes. i enjoy it and if i was able to, i would freeball all the time.

There was a whole discussion about not replying to stale old threads just above (in flat mode). This is a stale old thread. You replied to it. What is wrong with this picture?

well this post got out of contex i thought it was about free balling not weather or not u should answer old posts lol :grin: