How come this fetish is so popular

---

I don't get why boobs are such a huge turn on. Yes i understand they are smooth, fun to suck and very very squishy. However, why do people look down on people with other fetishes(feet, pretty teeth, bdsm and uhh other fetishes) Booobs are the same. Somehow they seem extrememly popular in the Europe/USA.

It is all due to culture and society views. Certain things are taboo in the US and UK. As time moves on these "fads" will come and go.

It does seem to be due largely to society and culture. Homosexuality was completely taboo many years ago.... which is not as much now. What is taboo now.... is liking young teen girls. The society hates it so much..... will this hate go away. It won't unless in the next 20 - 40 years that there was an a majority of people who liked mid teens. Then society, pscychiatrists and psychologists would all begin to accept it. But not for now it is complete taboo. What is strange about it... is that the society is getting completley bombarded with teens dressing so provactive more than ever.

Maybe you should see a psych and ask why you can't control your urges.

There is a big difference between wanting to do someone's foot and wanting to do a teenage girl. Unless the person doesn't want you to do their foot, no one is getting hurt. Having sex with young girls hurts them.

I don't know why people are so into breast. I'm not only not into other women's breast I don't like to have mine played with. They are really sensitive and it's painful to have them played with.
I breast feed my kids but it takes a couple of months for them to toughen up enough that I don't cringe when they latch on.

Are you retarded?!!!!Boobs are there to feed babies.And if my preference is based on my mom, then why do I like different sizes equally? My mom only had one pair and they were both of the same size.

its a thing that comes from ealy development. it sparks a thing in mens heads that the woman will reproduce better. same with bigger hips

If having sex with young girls (around 14-15 yrs old) hurts them. Then they should not be having it with their boyfriends... who may be that age also. Why. No. 1.... It can cause emotional damage for both of them them. And no. 2....It is against the law..... period and no exceptions. And I mean... 'no exceptions'.

Also.... many academics would say that both current psychiatry and psychology are products of a particular society and culture. We are also told that we live in a postmodern and multicultural society.... where there is no such thing as an absolute truth. We are supposed to believe in moral relativism.... where... what is good for one person or group may not be good for another and vice versa. If your reply is.... that you can believe and do what you like [as long] as it does not hurt someone.... then you have an absolute truth. The truth is that people should not be hurt. This means then you are no postmodern moral relativist. You believe in absolutes. So what makes homosexuality right ? Society ? Psychology ? Psychiatry ? In fact they were all condemning it 20 - 30 years ago.

14 and 15 years old should not be having sex. I never said they should. I don't get your point. ?I said there was a big difference between having a foot fetish and having sex with young girls. And that having sex with young girls hurts them. But I would like to point out that a young girl is hurt more when she is used and manipulated, as in the case of a pedophile, then she is with a bf that does in fact love her.

And most sex info that is clinically used today was taking from that sicko Kensey's report. I would hate to think that what convicted sex offenders think is what's normal. (A large part of his subjects were persons in prison for sex offenses.)

'that sicko' Kinsey spawned a sexual revolution, without which this forum would not exist all open and free like it does today, I would wager. I wonder what Dr. Bertman's opinion of Kinsey is?25% of his test subjects were, or had been, prison inmates. Do you know how expensive this kind of research is? A captive audience, so to speak, like a prison, is a great cheap resource- and remember, not everyone in prison is a pedophile, murderer or rapist.I haven't done a lot of reading or research on Kinsey, but the world we live in would be markedly different without him, whether his data and findings are true or false... what he did was throw a curveball straight in the face of the powers that be and contemporary society. If for only that, you gotta give props out to the man. He has been badmouthed constantly since the publication because it is in the best interest of plenty of organizations to discredit the information he gathered and slander the man and his work. Straight, tough, church-goin' cowboy USA can't have any of this bisexual or gay business getting any scientific backing if they're going to keep people in line.

I did not meant retarded literally. I don't care how much education you have that doesn't make you smart. I do think about the things I say before I write them. And I'm entitled to disagree with you on what a breast is for. If they are to attract men why aren't all men "breast men"? People can analyze whatever they want and think whatever they want but it doesn't make it true.Breast are for feeding babies. That’s my opinion and I’m stickin’ to it. lol

Kinsey gave pedophiles children to rape so that he could watch. If that isn't a sicko then I don't know what is.

Read a story about how the Kinsey report was put together. I wouldn't put something if I didn't believe it to be true.Doctors have done some really sick things in the name of science, so I don't find that hard to believe.

By all means feel free to do your own investigation. Don't take my word for it.

I never said I was smarter than anyone. ?

Big breasts and large hips have been universally used as a sign of fertility from the most ancient of cultures and as such is symbolic of sexual attraction.

You're always entitled to disagree. I can disagree and say that the earth doesn't rotate around the sun, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm wrong. Think whatever you want, but that doesn't make it true. Meaning you can go ahead and stick to your opinion, but just accept and understand that when your opinion is formed without having all of the facts and information, there's a good chance that it's going to be wrong. I suppose if you're going to be wrong, you might as well be strong about it too.

That's not fair. I'm entitled to my opinions and I feel very strongly about them. Well most of them anyway.I am IQ smart but not education smart. I barely graduated High School. (I found the whole school process boring and drawn out. They take 13 years to teach what they could teach you in 3 or 4.) If I had not taken the CHSPE I would not have graduated.And intelligence isn't something I hold in high value. It's better to be nice than to be smart.At any rate, there are many people A LOT smarter than me. But that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t disagree with them. I think debate and argument are good ways to learn new things and ways of thinking.