Sorry to bring it up but...

---

you really search the threads for posts that were made months and months ago...........steve, hon, im slightly worried about ya LOL

"Do you think doing that makes your "sluttish"* less offensive in the eyes of God?"

WOW if that wasn't a low blow I dont know what was.

a low blow? to who? dammit am i too thick to notice that steve insulted me cos i didn't understand all his big words, and now i have missed the crucial time to start an argument..........

no to pinkranger.

oh, well if you're replying to something many posts above, why not quote to what it is you are responding to, then people would get it

It is done!

pinkranger4 is a sanctimonious person who condemns people for being gay, yet she herself probably breaks several Commandments a day, but sees no problem with that.Do you have anything to say about the topic (homosexuality, homosexual behavior, the provenance of homosexuality), or are you more interested in having a discussion on the discussion, and refereeing?

NOW that makes sense

Gays were probably condemend because they didn't want the population to decline in their village, town etc.

Steve, remember the deal?You can do it buddy.

Wouldn't childless heterosexual couples, priests, nuns, and monks be condemned for the same reason?Nowadays, people don't think that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry because it's unnatural to be coupled that way if you can't have children. But what about people who are sterile, or women who are post-menopausal, or people who marry with no intention of having children?

There you go.
Now you're being a nice kitty.

Purrrrr...

I said what I had to say. Now you try and put it together in you head.

Dude, I have no deal with you. If you don't like the subject of this thread and its content is causing you discomfort, I suggest that you move on to another thread.

Steve, settle down dammit.Do you not get when people are trying to be light and humerous. I appreciate what you just posted. It's on topic, its relevent, it belongs there. I wasn't questioning that or anything else. Why the attack?I think it would be helpful for you to understand the tone of this community. Even in the midst of valid, helpful threads there will be a bit of bantering. I don't have a problem with that. It beats all of the vitriol and negativity by a long shot.Sheesh...learn to take a joke.

OK, you've said what you're going to say, and you're not interested in further discussion or analysis. Very well.

No, a case of passive aggression on your part. You make believe you're joking, where no reasonable person would interpret what you say is a joke. I assume you do it as a way to lash out, but (in your mind) look like the good guy. Very funny. Haven't we been over this a dozen times already?

You're a competitive, insecure, argumentative person, who follows up my posts an awful lot, but rarely, rarely has anything constructive to add to any thread on any topic. :grin: Ha ha, just kidding! Why don't you go put up a poll in the community forum, and ask people to rate your hilarity.

You're not funny. In the humor department, you are deficient. Give it up. And please stop hijacking threads.

I fit in quite well honestly.. how would you know how canada is.. have you ever lived here? If i wouldnt have said anything.. everyone would think homosexuality is fine and dandy.. and i dont think it is!

I've been to Canada, I've read about Canada, and I've spoken to a lot of people from Canada. I see how Canadians vote. I have the impression that the great majority of Canadians are not rednecks. Am I mistaken?> If i wouldnt have said anything.. everyone would think homosexuality is fine and dandy.. and i dont think it is!Well thank goodness you've disabused peple of that crazy idea! And I'm sure that you've convinced a lot of people that slutting around is fine and dandy, and that fooling around with other women is also a great idea, if the ultimate goal is to turn on the guys.

So steve.. you know me sooo well.. tell me which commandments I broke