If you have anything else to say to me, send me a PM.That sounds reasonable. But it would be as productive as arguing with a devout Christian about the divinity of Christ.> Don't clog the threads with your nonsense.To quote another poster: "Pot. Kettle. Black?"_______________________________________To get back to the thread...No, I wouldn't want to have my child circumcised, which could be a problem if the mother of the child did want to have it done. People with different belief systems can have a great relationship, but things sometimes get difficult when children arrive.
-
Would you have your child circumsized?
-
How many times can you circumsize each other? OK, Chucky. Should we cut your foreskin off today? Do you got the balls... I mean...
-
Now thats a useless post....
-
Women can experience clitoral orgasms without the clitoral hood, which is homologous to the male foreskin.
-
If / when I get a boy. I won't circ him. Thats dumb. Waste of money.I rather go buy a new computer or a bunch of videogames. Hehe...
-
In reply to:
Thats dumb.
wow, i'm convinced, such a compelling arguement.
-
I would probably have my son circumsized. It seems that uncut guys have so much trouble with cleaning, and other things that I have absolutley no idea about. I would definately let my husband have the final say since he has hands on knowledge of the subject.
-
So far every guy with a foreskin, who's discussed the subject, has said that cleaning is no big deal (as well as I can recall).
Who said that cleaning is so much trouble?
Yet another case of a female not thinking that a man's sexual sensation is a big deal.
-
All these threads about the pain involved with retracting, the problems cleaning, having foreskin making someone depressed, etc. I will not have this discussion about sexual sensation, because its just beating a dead horse.I will be the first to admit that I am quite ignorant about the pros/cons of circumsizion, but thats my opinion as of right now. Might change, might not. I'm not having kids anytime soon, so I've got plenty of time to think.
-
You have to understand that the people who post on this board with problems etc. are a small minority of intact men. A clear majority of men on this planet are not circumcised and the majority of them do not have problems. The majority of intact men never have problems with retraction etc. If you went to a message board about testicular cancer you would find many men who have problems with their testicles. Based on this would you decide that excision of one testicle would be beneficial (since cutting off one testicle halves one's chances of getting testicular cancer)?
-
Very well put, Blade07.Given the small minority of people with issues (that rearely require circumcision to fix), it's tragic to just willy nilly cut off foreskins. Maybe Americans just think that the great majority of the rest of the world just doesn't get it.
-
Although you may be right about the amount of males on here, making up only a small percentage of males on the earth that are intact, but I can't help but wonder how many males that are intact, HAVEN'T found these boards and posted on them, i think if every male who did, the number would be much greater, therefore increasing the percentage.maybe someone should make a thread condemning foreskin. This thread may not be labelled "circumcisions are wrong" but that is a sense of what one might get reading this thread. if I were a first time reader of this thread, I might be inclined to believe that my circumision was so unbelievably horrid, that I am missing out on such a greener pasture. When that is probably not the truth. If a male cut at birth can masturbate, ejaculate, enjoy sexual intercourse then that to me, shows signs that his member works perfectly as designed. A person who is cut later in life, to me reminds me of a person experiencing the ghost limb. where the arm or leg has been amputated but the sense that it remains is still there. There is always gonna be an adjustment...unavoidable if cut later in life. Do you think a child of 3 days is really gonna care whether he is cut or not when he does discover masturbation, as a form of sexual satisfaction?
-
I very much agree. I am circumsliced(jk) I have have no problems, sex is great, masturbation is great too. I am very happy the way I am! The intact just like to force their opinion so that they can feel normal!
-
So we can feel normal????? STFU. Intact males are the "normal" ones. TYVM
-
I could have taken a sledgehammer to your car and knocked out all the glass, scaped up the doors, and screwed with the computer to mess up the engine timing. If you've never driven an "intact" car, you'd never know the difference. You'd turn the key, the car would start, you'd put it in gear, it would move forward, etc. You'd think the car was fine.In reply to:The intact just like to force their opinion so that they can feel normal!I've heard some stupid crap around here, but you must be going for first prize. Maybe we should ask Paris Hilton about her opinion on the subject.
-
In reply to:Although you may be right about the amount of males on here, making up only a small percentage of males on the earth that are intact, but I can't help but wonder how many males that are intact, HAVEN'T found these boards and posted on them, i think if every male who did, the number would be much greater, therefore increasing the percentage.I read that three times. Still made no sense. Could you restate it?In reply to:If a male cut at birth can masturbate, ejaculate, enjoy sexual intercourse then that to me, shows signs that his member works perfectly as designed.You can take a child and feed him paint chips containing lead. If you feed him enough of them, you'll cause brain damange that will lower his adult intelligence. As an adult he will think he's just fine. But he will have lost something. He may think his brain is working perfectly as "designed", but it is not.Likewise with the sensation lost from circumcision. You might think you're just fine, but you don't realize the sensation that you've lost.In reply to:A person who is cut later in life, to me reminds me of a person experiencing the ghost limb. where the arm or leg has been amputated but the sense that it remains is still there.According to people that have been through the procedure, the sensation does not remain.
-
How about working on your sense of humor, peachy cream.
-
How do you know that the majority of uncut men dont have problems?In reply to: If you went to a message board about testicular cancer you would find many men who have problems with their testicles. Based on this would you decide that excision of one testicle would be beneficial (since cutting off one testicle halves one's chances of getting testicular cancer)? Your analogy doesn't really apply to this situation. Testicular cancer is something that is widely talked about in real life. The subject of circumsizion is taboo in our culture. I'd bet a lot of guys have problems, but its really not appropriate to talk about them. Some of you seem really bitter about being cut, and I'm sorry your mom had you circumsized. You seem to think that the grass is greener uncut, and they think the same about you. Thats my opinion on the subject, and I really have nothing else to say about it.
-
In reply to:
Testicular cancer is something that is widely talked about in real life.
If you're Lance Armstrong. What do you mean by "widely talked about"? It's mostly talked about by people who have it, which they consider a problem. I doubt that most uncircumcised men talk about being uncircumcised; just the relatively small number that are having problems.
Are you trying to say that there are tons of people with circumcision problems, and they're too embarrassed to discuss it? First of all, that's wild speculation, backed up by nothing more than a guess on your part. Secondly you're saying that God or evolution (take your pick) really screwed up the design of the penis. Most non-Americans disagree with that.
In reply to:
You seem to think that the grass is greener uncut, and they think the same about you.
WTF? If someone is uncircumcised and they want to be, all the have to do is to go get the surgical procedure. One poster, Roo, did do that (although he didn't want to), and you seem not believe that he feels what he says he feels. You're just taking it as a given that "cut" and "uncut" are two separate but equal states of being, but they're not! Why do you think you can make that assumption?
But if you're already circumcised, then what do you do? Someone has already made the decision on your behalf, and it's very difficult (if even possible) to reverse it.
How would you like it if you were forced to have a breast augmentation? After all, people like big breasts.
If someone wants to get circumcised, they can go ahead and do it. If someone has already made the choice for me, then what do I do?
-
Omg Let this thread die already