Sign if you're glad you're circumcised

---

Yeah, just as it reads. I haven't seen a thread like this yet. Girls can sign as well, if you're preference is for the cut, or "mutilated" members on these boards.

Well, your walking on coals posting this. several men are VERY persistent that Circumcision is the devil, but i personally. My opionion for those of you who come in here and yell...that i like them cut, but ive never sexual experianced a uncut one (im jewish).

i like being cut

Yes, you're absolutely correct, it was a risky post. But I had yet to see a thread praising cut men. Maybe not praising the action of cutting, but praising cut men, none the less. As for the men/women who say circumcisions are the devil, they may simply keep reading and disregard this thread.

I do!

I'm just glad I still have a penis. Fortunately, whoever cut me wasn't hitting the whiskey or the bong the day of surgery.How can you answer the question in any sensible way if you haven't experienced having a foreskin?

what question is that, steve? Whether I'm glad to have a cut penis? If that is the question, let me say a few reasons I am glad I'm cut. These are my opinions, take them how you wish. 1. I like not having to take the time to wash away smegma, regardless of how little time it takes. So what if it's necessary, the body also produces earwax, also as a lubricant, but that doesn't make it appealing.2. Cut penis' look characteristic, not just like one long tube with an elephant trunk finger on the end. 3. I didn't have to wait for the glands and foreskin to detach themselves from each other. 4. accompanying number 3, I don' have any stretching to do, which could take up a fairly good amount of time. I have nothing against uncut guys, but I don't like it when they try to make me feel "mildly handicapped" or sexually limited, or even less of a man, because I don't have trunk fingers on the end of my cock. Talk to any person with a REAL handicap. Talk about them like you do about us who are cut, better yet, devote a whole forum to them. It won't feel good to them. Nor does it feel good to me/us.

In reply to:Cut penis' look characteristic, not just like one long tube with an elephant trunk finger on the end.If you were used to having the elephant trunk penis, it would seem normal to you, and a circumcised one would look strange. I have a friend from "rural" New Hampshire who never saw a black person until he visited Boston as a young child. He thought it was very strange and didn't know what to make of it. It's what you're used to.But I like your analogy.As for "mildly handicapped", keep in mind that the word "handicapped" is not owned by the Muscular Dystrophy Association. It has a variety of meanings, including "hindrance".My ability to communicate seems to be handicapped by my inability to make my point succinctly and lucidly.

But I'm not hindered in any way. I can still feel pleasure when even the glans of my penis is touched. My shaft is sensitive, I could get off just by touching that, but that's boring. Just because you may have some extra skin, doesn't mean i'm hindered, or incapable of feeling the same sensations you might, not being a direct statement aimed at you, steve. That's just like saying, everybody compared to William Gates, is hindered because they don't have a Networth of 46 billion dollars.

Give me $46 billion and you can keep the foreskin.You may have great sensitivity now, but you might even have more sensitivity if you weren't cut. There seems to be good evidence to support that idea. You and I will never know for sure (unless I do that long and difficult skin stretching exercises, which doesn't sound like fun.)It's the difference between feeling really, really great versus really, really, really great. They're both good (really great, in fact), but one is better.It would be great if I had $4 million, but it would be really great if I had $4 billion.

I am sure you'd just like to have a job.

Not really. I've had 'em, and they're greatly overrated. I'd rather have a foreskin than a job, but I'd rather have $46 billion than a foreskin. Would you rather have $46 billion or a penis?

So every time I post here it's like a vote for no foreskin, right?

over a penis...umm....nah, i'd rather have a penis.

A penis because I could never spend $46 billion.

Unfortuntly aparantly you had no choice in the matter. Thats my argument and my bottom line. If as an ADULT you wish to consent to having your foreskin removed, you should have that right, without question or hesitation.But no child should ever have that right taken away from him for any reason that is not threatining his life in a dire, direct way. It should be illegal with very harsh punishments for anyone to take away that right from any child.

Lol unfortuneately? I'm glad I am...hence the reason for MY thread. Not mine as in i own it...for some of you smart asses out there...i know what you were thinking.

In reply to:1. I like not having to take the time to wash away smegma, regardless of how little time it takes. So what if it's necessary, the body also produces earwax, also as a lubricant, but that doesn't make it appealing.2. Cut penis' look characteristic, not just like one long tube with an elephant trunk finger on the end. 3. I didn't have to wait for the glands and foreskin to detach themselves from each other. 4. accompanying number 3, I don' have any stretching to do, which could take up a fairly good amount of time 1.Wow a whole 0.5 second to undo the foreskin and the SAME amount of time to clean the penis with soap and water??? You bug about a 0.5 second difference!?2.It looks characteristic because its what your used to seeing. That is the ONLY reason.3. No comment.4. I havent had to do any stretching since I was like 2. Not everyone with a foreskin does. So your stretching point is null and void.BTW I'm fine with being cut. I see no reason to lose my skin.

In reply to: 1.Wow a whole 0.5 second to undo the foreskin and the SAME amount of time to clean the penis with soap and water??? You bug about a 0.5 second difference!?2.It looks characteristic because its what your used to seeing. That is the ONLY reason.3. No comment.4. I havent had to do any stretching since I was like 2. Not everyone with a foreskin does. So your stretching point is null and void.BTW I'm fine with being cut. I see no reason to lose my skin. 1. 0.5 seconds eh? yeah ok, whatever you say. 2. it's not only what i'm used to seeing, I don't like the idea that I would have an elephant trunk on my body. 3. No comment? why not? Couldn't think of a good rebuttle?4. since you were two? I though the glands and skin didn't separate until puberty...wow you were early. Or there is mixed knowledge on these boards, I'll just wait till I see the other end of the spectrum posted...a guy who's over 18 with his skin still attached.You're fine with being cut? As in you have no skin? correct? Then what skin are you seeing no reason to lose? The skin you've already lost?

In reply to:I don't like the idea that I would have an elephant trunk on my body....because it's not what you're used to seeing. Cultures that perform other forms of body modification (disks in lower lip, rings that stretch neck, etc.) think an adult who's not modified is weird-looking.

Ok, but since we've established that more of the world is uncut, I like the look of my more unique cut penis.