Prostitutes

---

Sounds like something I read about in a Murakami novel. Well, if I ever get rich, and don't have a girlfriend or spouse, I'd have no problem with it.

in amsterdam the price range can vary. for sex its 50 euro not dollars and its 25 for a blowjob, but im not sure if their is a time limit. if it is 30 mins its easy to get it done in that time period when their is no forepaly involved.

I would have thought that prostitutes sex/bjs are no different than from any other person, except for the fact your wasting your money, when there's people who would do it for free Hay-J xXx

I would say that a blow job from some one who loves you is better than with a prostitute, I know i go all out to please my man, i know what he likes, loves and what he doesn't really like, a pro wouldn't know those things.........plus i have all the time in the world to 'play' im not on the clock grin he says i could make a fortune if I ever decided to give bj's for money tho laffin

Good point, Angelwitch. A pro - as you put - is not going to give a damn who's cock is in her mouth. She'll have no feeling towards you and wont know what the guy likes. Its just a business deal to her. Its better done in the comfort of someone you care about and who's not going to have a clock running the whole time lol

Hay-J xXx

Love is great, but there's a certain amount of skill involved as well. Some women do it a lot better than others. You can communicate with the women you love to help him/her refine his/her technique if you can communicate about such things, but, in general men/women who are very experienced do a better job.

And what if you don't have someone you love?

I gotta chime in here...I think that if your out just looking for a good time, a prostitute is the way to go. Then your only out the money. If you take a girl out, you buy dinner, a few drinks, yada yada yada, you still spent the bucks, but then there is the chance of getting told no, and the risk of hurt feelings, and still a risk of stds so what is the harm in just spending the bucks? Plus, they get paid to do it, they might put more into it, and you could tell them exactly what you want.

Prostitutes are more likely to have STD's, going out with a prostitute is just plain low and sad

If you have sex with anyone you don't know well, you don't know what STDs they might have. So, in effect, if you have sex on the third date, you still have to treat the other person as a prostitute, if you value your health.

But it's true; the chance of someone who is promiscuous (whether or not they're a prostitute) of having an STD is higher. But you never know.

"Plain low and sad" is a value judgment. I'm not sure that picking up some drunk person in a bar for a one-night roll in the hay is "better"; the exchange of money for sex seems to be the issue here. There are lots of people whose relationships are based on money. Some don't want to have the type of relationship you might like.

Seems like there's a lot of judging going on around here.

Long story short, I spent a brief period of time on the employee end of things. It was strickly a business relationship. She was young and extreamly ambitious. She needed someone who presented well at social functions as well as "private functions". She didn't want the rest of the baggage getting in the way of her work-aholic career building.It seemed to make sense at the time. I don't know where she is now but I'm sure she's successful.

Well in my opinion a person who is seeing a prostitute has something really "disturbing" that's going on in their life that needs to be solved. The same with the prostitute, something in their life is not quite right.

A> X is bad.B> That's judgemental (i.e., Can you support your position with objective data?)A> Well, X is bad.OK, whatever.This a religious position, even if no particular named religion is involved.

A religious position? That is my opinion, everyone can state their opinions around here, there's nothing wrong with that. You and I have two different opinions and that's fine. Neither may be right and neither may be wrong...they're opinions.

If you posit an opinion, but can't explain _why_ you have that opinion, then you're just venting. If there were people posting here who had PhDs and were conveying information on their specialty, I wouldn't be so critical. God would also get a pass, if she posted here.
But if you say, "that's bad", and I say, "that's good", and someone else says, "I agree" (and nothing more), who cares? What value does it add?

This is an internet forum, one that ranges from discussing llamas to mars bars. I simply stated my opinion. I don't need to write up a mini essay on why I think that way.

This is supposedly a thread on prostitution, which is a serious subject.It's up to you. You can help make the forum as informative or as chatty as you like. If you think people gain by knowing your moral positions ("This is bad." "That is good."), then go for it.

There are typically 2 types of prostitute in my oppinion legal and illeagal ones.The illeagal ones will probably be high priced trash with more STDs going around than a Micheal Jackson sleepover! The kind i would consider the stereotypical prostitute.Then theres the legal ones like in Amsterdam. Since its legal its a lot more above board, the women have to be tested for STDs every few months and from what i've been told are very professional. Some women like sex, why not make a living out of it? Its not all pimps here, its like applying for a job at a supermarket over there, good money doing something you enjoy!

If you want to push this to a chatty/informative topic, then I could go ahead and pull up a number of serious threads where you gave responses that were "chatty" or not serious, so your previous statement was a little hypocritical in "my opinion". Anyways I'm off to attend to real life matters at the moment. Have a wonderful evening.

There are high-priced call girls in the U.S. I'd wager the ones that get several hundred dollars an hour for their services tend to take good care of themselves. Of course, there is still risk.But since prostitution, like drugs, is illegal in most places, it goes unregulated. That means no testing for STDs, etc. Yet it goes on in a big way. This is where the "moral" position breaks down. It's bad, but people do it, people catch STDs, people suffer. Some would say they're getting what they deserve.

Two wrongs don't make a right. My screwing up doesn't let everyone else off the hook. But sometimes it gets pretty narcissistic around here.And shouldn't a moderator try to set the best possible example?