and government sites are oriented against the use of marijuana.
-
Does pot affect your driving?
-
So then there's no place to get objective information?The U.S. government has starved illicit drug researchers of grants, so there's really not a lot of good experimental data. Requesting a grant to research marijuana often causes difficulty when requesting government grants in the future; in other words, scientists get put on a shit list.
-
In reply to:
A 1983 study by the US National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) used stoned drivers on simulators, and concluded that the only statistically significant effect associated with marijuana use was slower driving.
yeah thats the only thing i notice when im stoned. when im sober im a dangerous driver, i reach speeds up to 60 in residential areas and i will not yield for anyone, if an asshole decides to make a left turn in front of me while i have right away, bye bye dumbass ill kill you and your family and i wont even get a citation for it cause i did nothing wrong there. i tail old people right on there bumper and i honk at school buses cause i hate children. i have a lot of road rage.
when im stoned im chilled out and i just enjoy the music on sirius
-
"i wont even get a citation for it cause i did nothing wrong there"You have a very messed up view on the law and the legal system. You go out and kill somebody and see if you "get a citation" or not.
-
Hey dumbshit, if someone turns in front of you and you had the the right of way and you hit them, they're at fault. Read my posts thoroughly before you comment on something you know nothing about, thank you.
In a worst case scenario it's manslaughter and I'd do 5 years cause I got a good lawyer.
I could always say "I was just driving through the green light and he made a quick stupid left turn in front of me, there was nothing I could do".
-
In reply to:i wont even get a citationIn reply to:it's manslaughter and I'd do 5 yearsNeed I say more?
-
No, please explain that. Besides that wasn't the point of what I was saying, you're too stupid to realize that I was using the whole "crashing into a moron driver thing" to illustrate a point. And you don't do time for killing someone in an accident, that's why it's an accident, unless you're DUI.
-
How old are you again, 5? Well whatever, if you ever get into the real world you'll be in for a rude awakening, that's for sure.
And you were just making a point, just like you were just making a point in comparing your life to hollywood/pornos and how you would use rape a girl who's boyfriend just died?
Just look at yourself man, you're really messed up.
-
Let me dissect your bullshit first, especially the parts that I have clarified many times before and most importantly the parts that were just jokes you were too moronic to understand. In reply to: How old are you again, 5? Well whatever, if you ever get into the real world you'll be in for a rude awakening, that's for sure. You act extremely immature. In reply to: And you were just making a point, just like you were just making a point in comparing your life to hollywood/pornos Comment went like this:someone else: oh yeah it would be fun till her husband walked in?me: well ive seen pornos end up different(or went something like that)It was a joke, I told you this before but you just don't get it, you keep bringing it up but it means nothing. I don't know why you're still on it, you're too stupid to understand sarcasm. In reply to: how you would use rape a girl who's boyfriend just died? Rape? Hahaha, I said that "if a girls boyfriend died id take that oppurtunity to try and replace him". You're a complete jackass to equate that with forcibly having sex with her.In the end, you're messed up. You're just a dumbass
-
If you say so
-
In reply to:
If you say so
Wow, that's all you can come up with. You're pathetic, you're a fucking joke and you cannot even admit you're wrong.
-
"you cannot even admit you're wrong"haha that was funny
-
In reply to:In a worst case scenario it's manslaughter and I'd do 5 years cause I got a good lawyer.That's one solution to the virginity problem, but probably not the one you had in mind.If you're following someone too closely and you ram then in the rear, you're pretty much fully responsible.There are a lot of things you can get away with legally, but are unethical, or have a negative impact on society. Since you are a very, very self-centered guy, that may not have any meaning to you.
-
What's funny, you're still dodging everything. You're wrong and you can't accept it.
-
You see, it doesn't matter anyways because for 1: I wasn't posting about crashing into someone, my point was that I'm a more chilled out and safer driving while on weed, 2: that's a worst case scenario, it won't happen so there's no point for you and you're cock buddy insearch to dwell on it.
-
That MUST be it
-
You may be posting stuff about agressive driving to elicit a reaction (i.e., you're trying to get attention), but if I take you at your word, then some of your behaviors are sociopathic, even if they're not illegal. There seems to be no new information to add to the "Is it safe to drive while I'm stoned?" debate. You are satisfied, based on your own perceptions of your own experience, that it is safe. You seem not to have any doubt at all about it. When I tell you this is a religious belief, you don't understand.I'm not sure where the "cock buddy" thing comes from. That guy probably hates me as much as he hates you.So, since there's nothing more to say about the driving safety thing that's not repetetive, what's the deal with your seeming not to care about strangers? If someone gives you a hard time while you're driving, does that mean they deserve to die?
-
I guess you ran out of things to make a big deal out of.
-
And I can vouch that driving can be done safely while stoned because I too am still alive and suprisingly all of my accidents have occured while sober. I don't get your obsession with "religious beliefs". The only thing I do different is drive slower and more catiously.
-
I can't seem to penetrate into your mind the idea that your subjective evaluation of yourself is not worth much. Kind of like the folks who beleive their cancer is fixed by a visit to the faith healer. Kind of like at least one friend of mine who insists she drives perfectly fine (if not better) when she is very drunk.You don't have enough data to make a determination about yourself. People sometimes dodge bullets for their whole lives (e.g., smoking two packs of cigarettes a day), but most don't. It's a statistical thing. And sometimes they get lung cancer without ever having touched a cigarette.Have you studied science at all?