Confused 15 year old guy....

---

MY GOD PEOPLE!I'm so confused now! I am the creator of this post if anyone doesn't realize that.I myself, do NOT want to be gay. Not just because of what other people think, but what I think, I don't want to be gay.Now, latly I have been getting some strong gay feelings that I am pushing out of my mind. I have a girlfriend now and I really like her. Reason I don't want to be gay is that I can't see myself actually having a relationship in that kind of way with a guy. It is only a physical attraction I have to guys. I could never kiss/hug/sleep with another guy. My mind if so messsed! I had an 98% average at the end of 1st semester now it is under 70 because of this mess. I am getting despressed, I am so confused. God can't even help me now

the lack of romantic interest would lead me to believe that you aren't gay. At your age, there tend to be 2 major things hapening. As you drift away from the child-parent relationship, there is often a craving for intamacy simply because you can't cuddle with mom and dad the same as you did as a child. There is also the insane surge of hormones making you want to screw everything. These two things can confilct with each other and/or become confused with each other.There's no quick fix or a cure other than time. As you mature, things will normalize and you will settle into your own sexuality.If, by chance, you come to the conclusion that you are in fact gay, please don't fight it or repress it. That can lead to long lasting psychological problems and misery.I wish the best for you

In reply to: You may not like or care for his opinion, but please lets not tell people to go away. F22 is an intelligent writer and his opinions may differ, but there is no reason to have him shunned. Again, my post was meant to be sarcastic. I support F22 and his right to post what he is posting. I too think he is intelligent and wish people would at least give him a decent hearing instead of calling him names and discounting him because they don't agree with what they think he's saying.I hope I'm in the clear here...

yeah they are.... it is terrible how biased they are.

I have to respectfully disagree. They are no more biased than the other three networks. I think the difference is that Bill O'Reilly is more honest about his bias than Dan Rather. Besides, most of Fox news channel is commentary, which is supposed to be biased. Their actual news really is fair and balanced. And then there's CBS...how can you, in light of the whole 'forged military papers', not think they are biased.

Sorry for giving an off topic response to an off topic post.

sorry, but yeah that is very true as well. If you want the news, watch multiple stations.

In reply to: Reason I don't want to be gay is that I can't see myself actually having a relationship in that kind of way with a guy. You certainly don't sound gay to me. The strongest indication of this is the portion of your post I quoted above. I believe a gay would see himself in that role.It sounds to me that you are a normal teen with too much hormones going through you. Don't let anybody convince you that "..................... means you are gay", (where all the dots are anything from "patting your own butt" to "whatever"). (I have seen all kinds of stuff on these forums where people post "that means you are gay" -- rubbish!) The choice is still yours.

In reply to: sorry, but yeah that is very true as well. If you want the news, watch multiple stations. ...yeah just make sure that one of those multiple stations isn't fox news! lol

hahaha...well in order to be an understanding person involved in politics you need to watch both sides of the story.

In reply to: Well, at least the head of CBS didn't work for Bush Sr (Roger Ailes of FOX News). I might turn over there to see what kind of crap they are spitting out to gullible people, but I do think they are biased. They aren't even real reporters. Just mouthpieces for the Bush Administration! Please, can you offer up something other than the same old tired propagandistic soundbites. I've heard crap like this for years. First of all, it's a very common thing for media folks to go back and forth between the media and a government position. Would you like a list of prominent media personalities and moguls who have worked for Democratic presidents? It's such the load of shit when folks get all upset at Roger Ailes but conveniently forget or ignore the fact that he is one of countless. The only problem with him is that he worked for a Republican administration, which somehow makes him a pariah. Unbelievable hypocrisy.And how do you qualify 'real reporters'? You mean like the folks on the NBC or CBS morning shows who gave Kitty Kelly 3 freakin days to peddle her garbage like it was peer reviewed research, and refused to let the swift boat vets say a word? Yeah, that's real non-biased reporting.I just can't for the life of me see how otherwise intelligent people can say this kind of crap. The same crap we've been hearing from Bill Maher and every 'kool' dread-locked BMW driving hacky-sack playing young pseudo-liberal on every college campus in the USA. It's like a freaking mantra.Sorry, just had to get that off my chest!

In reply to:Let me use this analogy. My dad was abusive. He would regularly take out his anger on family members and family pets. One day my mom got tired of it and sent him to a mental health institution for counseling. She knew that most people were not regularly abusive in such ways. They found out though, that it was not all because of the environment he grew up in. He had a chemical imbalance that caused him to be more angry and get more easily agitated than most people. While he may have at some level had a choice to control it, he did not know how and hardly even realized what he was doing.So it was genetic. Does this mean that we should leave it untreated, and let him beat us because that's 'who he is' or should we help him seek help, and try to find a medical cure for his imbalance since it's hurting both his family and his personal and work life? Should we help him find a way to treat it and to live a normal lifestyle? Of course. He got counseling on how to deal with his anger, and also pills to tone it down a bit, and he's much better now, and much happier with who he is. Ok first of all being homosexual does not hurt anyone (I will explain in a second) and obviously your Dads abusive behavior was. Also homosexuality is not treatable and is not "cureable" so the analogy means nothing. In reply to:It IS a medical condition (on the presupposition that it is caused by chemical imbalances, which hasn't been shown yet) While some may see it as acceptable in society, many do not, and it is not the accepted norm. We could just as easily incorporate abusiveness into society and assume it as moral. (my dad had the same chemical imbalance causing anger that is found in many 3rd degree murderers...should that be allowed into society as practicing acceptable behavior? My opinion is that they may as well be if we accept homosexuality as well) I also think it is caused by either chemical or hormonal imbalances and it being not accepted by other people doesnt mean anything... there always has and always will be gay people NO matter what people preach do or say. People can even go as far as killing all known gay people but guess what? That wouldnt solve anything because straight couples produce gay children... not gay couples. Read above about trying to put homosexuality on par with abusiveness.In reply to:One example of evidence is that STD's are spread most wildly amongst the homosexual population in comparison to the heterosexual. This is usually caused by anal sex (in males) so it would be a great help in countering the current STD problem if people would be more careful in considering the consequences before acting.Um, anyone who knowingly has unprotected sex deserves to get whatever their parter has. Btw its more common among homosexuals because they dont have to worry about getting someone pregnant .In reply to:A second negative impact on society by homosexuality is the impact on younger generations and kids of homosexuals. Yes, many kids of homosexuals grow up straight, and some grow up gay. More kids from homosexual families grow up to be gay than straight than in heterosexual families. (this also shows that it is more an issue of environment rather than genetics because homosexual couples can't have kids on their own except through previous engagements or insemination) Still though, more kids being gay doesn't seem to be a problem for most people, until one considers the mental problems of a child raised by homosexuals. Some studies have shown that homosexual families are less stable, more angry and abusive, and children also have problems with social skills and interacting with others normally (usually through fear of other kids finding out) school work, sexual identity, and many other problems have been seen. Some kids grow up mentally and sexually healthy out of a homosexual home, and while some grow up unhealthy mentally and sexually through heterosexual parents, the healthiest typically come out of a heterosexual home because they have less issues to worry about. I’m not at all saying that ALL homosexual families aren’t capable of raising children well, but raising children healthily isn’t the norm for the typical homosexual ‘family’Ok your idea that homosexual families create more homosexual children than heterosexual families is completely false. ALL homosexuals at one point were conceived from heterosexual couples. If the child was bisexual or homosexual yes he or she might be encouraged to be homosexual but their sexuality is not made out of thin air. Also dont dare comment about the childs fear of others finding out because that fear is perpetuated by you and others like you. Lastly, ALL families have problems definetly not just homosexual ones cough ~50% divorce rate cough. In reply to:There are many other websites giving new information that agrees with this idea, and many others that confirm the evidence given here.Wow those websites are biased.In reply to:So I guess what I said in this was homosexuality is a choice. If you don’t want it, don’t choose it. Sometimes, in light of the possibility that sexual orientation is caused by an imbalance, one must try a little harder to achieve the goals of the choice made. If you have this chemical imbalance, menotme, or anybody else struggling with this issue, but you really don’t want to be gay, putting in a little extra effort to overcome it will be well worth it because you’ll be happier knowing you’re being who you want to be. If your choice didn’t affect the society you live in, and if homosexuality wasn’t shown to have a negative impact on families in general, then the choice would be arbitrary. However, that’s not the case, so choose wisely and do what’s best for you, your family, and your country.Lol, effort. Oh yeah maybe just maybe you should do something YOU feel is right not your family country or soceity.In reply to:To answer more questions from the original post, a 15 year old can get an erection from pretty much anything, especially something with a sexual stigma, like ANYBODY nude. By wanting to see him, you aren't gay, more or less just bicurious, which is normal for most. Just because it's normal doesn't mean that action should be taken, however, such as to ask to jerk him off. Sexual addiction is also very common and it's best to avoid it, especially at your age. It's your decision, nobody can choose for you, but just be careful.A 15 yr old can get erection from anything? Hah, maybe if you were gay you would know its a physical impossibility for some to have sex with members of the opposite gender.

yeah and to get the right-wing point of view i guess that would be the perfect place for it.(honestly, i find myself watching that channel for the same reason i find myself watching the realworld, to be awe struck at how bad the ignorance of this country has gotten...)

after running that through my centrest filter, you all are saying the same thing.The media is always a filtered representation of the truth. Left, right, whatever, every piece of news you see went through an editorial filter.Only a fool only listens to the one source that aggrees with his view. There are too many people in this world who swear they are 100% correct based on 10% of the available information.

exactly...news is always made to look better. It really is a shame.

word.....!

Deleted post????

well done. well done.

Yeah, I agree totally.

I am so freaking lost.

My last post looks rather random cause the post I was responding to is no longer there...