What the Bible Says/Doesn't Say About Homosexualit

---

YOU re read ittell me where homosexual sex is specifically condemneddo it now!Then tell me, specifically, where the "new law" allowed the eating of pork and shrimp, yet still condemned sex acts that you find distastefulIf you can't explain this all now, in plain and obvious terms, you must accept that your religion is invalid.OR, you can simply admit that you are a man of faith and stop telling other men and women of faith that they are wrong.What is your choice?

Originally Posted By: unsupervisedYOU re read ittell me where homosexual sex is specifically condemneddo it now!Then tell me, specifically, where the "new law" allowed the eating of pork and shrimp, yet still condemned sex acts that you find distastefulIf you had asked politely, I would have done it. As it is, you can go find the references yourself. But I will point out that the answer to your first question is in the second post of this thread...right in front of your eyes. Quote:If you can't explain this all now, in plain and obvious terms, you must accept that your religion is invalid.OR, you can simply admit that you are a man of faith and stop telling other men and women of faith that they are wrong.What is your choice? Tsk-tsk. You still can't quit trying to make decisions for me and tell me what I must and must not do. Sounds to me like you're the biggest violator of your own precepts.

Quote: Don't forget that the homosexual act is simply a specific kind of fornication...or adultry, if at least one of the parties is married.Homosexuals are not the only people that fornicate, so why isn't the church as harsh on them as they are on Homosexuals. As for adultry, adultry is primarily a heterosexual issues since Homosexuals cannot be married. So don't try and push your adultry BS on homosexuals.  Quote: Get the church to accept openly practicing adulters...that sort of thingHomosexuals are not adulters... do you need the definition?Definition: Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse.Last I checked, in the majority of the United States, Homosexuals cannot marry. Now I am not saying that there might not be the instances where a married man or woman might not commit adultry with someone of the same gender. But to say Homosexuals are trying to get the church to openly accept adultry is absolutely BS and you know it. Quote:If you had asked politely, I would have done it Omg are you serious? That has to be the most immature and childish response. Lets be really honest here, if you had the answers you would be more than happy to give them. There was a moment near the end of the article that really brought it home for me: Quote: The Pope said something we must never forget: "Recent historical studies enable us to state that this sad misunderstanding now belongs to the past." Unfortunately, the apology came too late to relieve Galileo of his suffering. What if the biblical scholars of Galileo's day had said to Galileo, "We don't agree with your Copernican theories, but we love and trust you. As long as you love God and seek God's will in your life, you are welcome here."Imagine the suffering that could be avoided if the church could say this to their lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender children: "We don't understand your views about sexual orientation, but we love and trust you. As long as you love God and seek God's will in your life, you are welcome here." As Christian is this not how we are supposed to live our lives? We are to leave the judging up to God, for in the end he will have the final say. Not you, not me, nor the Pope in Rome.

Originally Posted By: NtroducingMyself Quote: Don't forget that the homosexual act is simply a specific kind of fornication...or adultry, if at least one of the parties is married.Homosexuals are not the only people that fornicate, so why isn't the church as harsh on them as they are on Homosexuals. As for adultry, adultry is primarily a heterosexual issues since Homosexuals cannot be married. So don't try and push your adultry BS on homosexuals.  Quote: Quote: Get the church to accept openly practicing adulters...that sort of thingHomosexuals are not adulters... do you need the definition?Definition: Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse.Last I checked, in the majority of the United States, Homosexuals cannot marry. Now I am not saying that there might not be the instances where a married man or woman might not commit adultry with someone of the same gender. But to say Homosexuals are trying to get the church to openly accept adultry is absolutely BS and you know it.In short, plenty of homosexuals are married to women and have children...only to have affairs with men on the side. Don't plead ignorance to this fact...you are well aware of it. As for church, there are no groups of adulterers/fornicaters infiltrating our schools and legislature to con folks into accepting such practices as acceptable. The same cannot be said of homosexuality. Get it? If there were such groups, I'm sure the church would be at least as outspoken against them as they are about the Homo-Agenda.I really wish you'd actually bother to read my entire posts and ask questions about what you don't understand. Either that, or quit taking things out of context to the point where they mean nothing like they did when in context. Your responses to what I wrote are so far removed from the original progression of thought that addressing them turns into simply re-stating the same thing over and over again. Quote: Quote:If you had asked politely, I would have done it Omg are you serious? That has to be the most immature and childish response. Lets be really honest here, if you had the answers you would be more than happy to give them. And you're just about the last person on this board to talk to anybody about childish behavior. Your response above to what I wrote to somebody else is a perfect example of this.

Quote:In short, plenty of homosexuals are married to women and have children...only to have affairs with men on the side. Don't plead ignorance to this fact...you are well aware of it. I think "plenty" is a bit extreme, but yes there are some. And yes I am aware of this, did you miss the part where I said that myself? But to claim that homosexuals are trying to make the church accept adultery is absolutely BS, and you know it. Homosexuals are no different than heterosexuals when it comes to adultery; in majority we don't like it. Are there some that don't care? Absolutely, but the same can be said about heterosexuals.But if you are going to use the word adultery, than use it in the correct context. Adultery refers to married persons having sex outside their marriage. Adultery is primarily a heterosexual issue, so if you have problems with adultery take it up with the heterosexuals, not the homosexual community.  Quote: The same cannot be said of homosexuality. quote]Being tolerance of someone that is different, even if it’s against your belief, is not the same as acceptance. I have said this many times, I could careless if you or the Church accept me. I'm not in this for acceptance (because your acceptance is not needed or wanted), I am here for Equality. And I can tell you the majority of homosexuals feel the same way I do. [quote]quit taking things out of context to the point where they mean nothing like they did when in context. Follow by example and maybe people will follow suit.  Quote: And you're just about the last person on this board to talk to anybody about childish behavior. Your response above to what I wrote to somebody else is a perfect example of this. "I know you are but what am I".. That’s pretty much what you meant, right?

Originally Posted By: NtroducingMyself Quote: The same cannot be said of homosexuality. Being tolerance of someone that is different, even if it’s against your belief, is not the same as acceptance. I have said this many times, I could careless if you or the Church accept me. I'm not in this for acceptance (because your acceptance is not needed or wanted), I am here for Equality. And I can tell you the majority of homosexuals feel the same way I do.And yet once again, you're stuck because you don't understand, or can't accept, that there is a difference between a homosexual and homosexuality. The first is a person...the second a behavior. The church accepts the person...and does NOT accept the behavior (for reasons indicated in post #2, as well as a host of others found in the Bible). Nobody is perfect, but there is a difference between doing something wrong and accepting that it is wrong and trying to change, and denying that something is wrong and trying to champion that it is actually right. Doing the latter will get you kicked out of many a church real fast...and rightly so. This does not mean the people don't accept you as a person...it means that your behavior is not to be tolerated.As for equality, you are, regardless of how you choose to see it, effectively asking for the church to accept gay marriage...soemthing that is not up to them. That belongs to God, and He has already stated what a marriage is in the Bible. The church is simply following the Bible in the matter. You are trying to make yourself into God and attempting to convince people that it is up to them to determine what marriage is. Go back and read Romans 1 until it sinks in.

Originally Posted By: thorIf you had asked politely, I would have done it. As it is, you can go find the references yourself. But I will point out that the answer to your first question is in the second post of this thread...right in front of your eyes.Tsk-tsk. You still can't quit trying to make decisions for me and tell me what I must and must not do. Sounds to me like you're the biggest violator of your own precepts. sure, keep making excuses rather than answering questions to which you have no answer. This, I've come to expect and accept.I'm not telling anyone what to do as I am not a member the dictatorial version of any religion or political system.I am merely an observerthor, I wish you could see the world through my eyes, just for a moment. It's a wondrous place. A universe of diversity and possibility beyond the scope of any creation myth. And here, on our little planet, a dominant species capable of good and evil, love and hate... and arrogance.it's fascinatingI also wish you could read the bible as I do, without precepts of it's meaning. There is a lot to be learned about civilization in the bible but a closed mind does a deep disrespect to its authors.I'm not to sure what you think faith is but i can tell you that it's a journey, not a destination. It's a process of learning and enlightenment. The more I learn, the more my belief system becomes enriched and complex. For this, I am grateful, yet still sad for those who cannot grow with me.

Originally Posted By: unsupervisedsure, keep making excuses rather than answering questions to which you have no answer. This, I've come to expect and accept.I have an answer...and if you had asked nicely instead of like some dictatorial tyrant that had powers over the lives of others, I'd have given it to you. No such luck. Quote:The more I learn, the more my belief system becomes enriched and complex. For this, I am grateful, yet still sad for those who cannot grow with me. We all are equal, but we start our spiritual walk from different locations. As a result, each of our walks is uniquely our own. Some of what you learn another may have been born knowing, and so forth. Don't expect your learnings to be as enlightening to others as you initially think they might be...others may be way ahead of you. Christ and the Bible denote the direction...and if your path conflicts with them, you are going astray. It sometimes helps to have others around that can help point it out to you. Again, we are imperfect...and we don't catch everything by ourselves. But I have to disagree with you in that, as you grow spiritually, things become more simple...not more complex. Perhaps the understanding becomes more complex...but it's not something human beings are capable of grasping completely anyway.

Quote: The church accepts the person...and does NOT accept the behaviorThey do? Than why are many homosexuals asked to leave Churches? I (and I know other gay Christians) have been told we are not Christians because we are gay. There is sadly still plenty of "Christians" who feel its okay to kill gay people. So don't talk to me about what the Church accepts and what they don't because you have absolutely no idea, or like many other people turn a blind eye because it don't personally affect you.  Quote:The church is simply following the Bible in the matter. So the church gets to pick and choose what it follows. This is essentially what you are telling me. What about all the other scriptures that the church has decided not to continue to follow? Shouldn't we still follow all those scruptures as well? Please show me where God states its okay to ignore those but not the views on homosexuality? Let me make it easy, there is no such thing.Sexuality was not something that was understood back than, so the laws, to them, made sense to the time. But in todays science and education, those same laws do not make sense. Just as the laws of not eating sea food, avoiding anything made form pig skin etc. no longer makes sense today.

Originally Posted By: NtroducingMyself

Quote:

The church accepts the person...and does NOT accept the behavior

They do? Than why are many homosexuals asked to leave Churches? I (and I know other gay Christians) have been told we are not Christians because we are gay.

In my view, it would only be correct to ask practicing homosexuals to leave...not because they're gay, but because of their behavior. I explained the person/behavior concept in my post above.

Quote:

Quote:

The church is simply following the Bible in the matter.

So the church gets to pick and choose what it follows. This is essentially what you are telling me. What about all the other scriptures that the church has decided not to continue to follow? Shouldn't we still follow all those scruptures as well? Please show me where God states its okay to ignore those but not the views on homosexuality? Let me make it easy, there is no such thing.

To put it bluntly, your knowledge of the Bible sucks.

1Timothy 4
[4] For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
[5] For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

The key is that it must be received with thanksgiving.

Quote:

Sexuality was not something that was understood back than, so the laws, to them, made sense to the time. But in todays science and education, those same laws do not make sense. Just as the laws of not eating sea food, avoiding anything made form pig skin etc. no longer makes sense today.

Ah...I see...so now it's you and not the church that is doing the picking and choosing. Pot, meet Kettle...Kettle, Pot. And folks were not ignorant of sexuality back then as you suggest. It's not exactly rocket science.

Quote:In my view, it would only be correct to ask practicing homosexuals to leave...not because they're gay, but because of their behavior. I explained the person/behavior concept in my post above. So its okay to deny homosexuals a place to worship? Interesting, but not a surprise an arrogant person like yourself would think its okay to turn away Gods Children. Its not the Churches business what I do in my personal life, I am there to worshop God, THAT'S what they should be concerned about.  Quote: To put it bluntly, your knowledge of the Bible sucks.Well to put it bluntly, so does yours. You pick and choose what fits your agenda but ignore everything else. Plus, I never once made the claim that I was all knowledgeable when it comes to the bible. I'm human and I have my faults, and I am always willing to learn. Something I cannot say for you.  Quote:Timothy 4[4] For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:[5] For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.The key is that it must be received with thanksgiving. Show me where God said said all the past scriptures, expect the ones direct towards homosexuals, have been forgiven and lifted from law? I am still waiting.  Quote:And folks were not ignorant of sexuality back then as you suggest. It's not exactly rocket science. You obviously did not read the article fully, or you'd have your answer to this. He has a whole section devoted to this topic. They did not understand sexuality, and though it might not be "rock science", there is science behind sexuality. The fact they had no idea how a child was conceieved speaks volumes to their knowledge of sexuality.

Homosexuality is an abomination. There is no lifting of abominations found anywhere in the Bible. As such, the coming of Christ did not fulfill any law concerning homosexual bahavior. And in case you still don't get it, go back and read in post #2 where the NEW TESTAMENT speaks against homosexuality.

You've got a decision to make, Eddie...and it seems to me you've already made it.

Quote:I have an answer...and if you had asked nicely instead of like some dictatorial tyrant that had powers over the lives of others, I'd have given it to you. No such luck. I'm not sure what you mean by "ask nicely". Do you condemn the views of others, including scholars, theologians and clergy, "nicely"?  Quote:Some of what you learn another may have been born knowing, and so forth. When you were born, you knew nothing more than me and every other animal on earth, silly boy.I respect your views on a spiritual journey. It is very different than my journey. I seek the knowledge that you believe to be innate. I'll never have all the answers and will only stop looking when I'm dead. If, by some freak chance, I must meet my maker after death, I will stand proudly on my life and actions, knowing that my chosen morals are equal or superior to anyone's enforced morals.

Quote: There is no lifting of abominations found anywhere in the Bible. Quote:What other abominations does the Bible specify? Of course, adultery (Lev 18:20), sex with animals (Lev 18:23), remarrying one's wife after she's had another husband in between (Deut 24:4), or approaching any woman and humming "Strangers in the Night" during the time of her "uncleanness" (Lev 18:19). Cross-dressing is out (Deut 22:5), and that includes Halloween costumes, slacks on women, bib overalls on little girls, or a wife wearing her husband's favorite Oxford buttondown. And more on buttondowns in a moment.Other abominations include tarot readings, glancing at your horoscope, trimming one's beard, and getting a tattoo, even if it says, "Mom" (Lev 19:26-28). Haughty eyes (Prov 6:17) and telling lies (Prov 6:17, 12:22) are big abominations. Being untruthful also includes false weights and measures (Prov 11:1), or any other dishonesty in business. "Everyone who acts unjustly is an abomination to the LORD your God" (Prov 11:16).What do abominators have for dinner? Rare steaks off the grill (Lev 17:10), Lobster Newburg at the Krebs and crab cakes in Baltimore (Lev 11:10), a rack of ribs at the Dinosaur Bar-B-Que (Lev 11:7).But abominations are not just about bodily functions. Charging or paying interest are abominations. Bankers and anyone with a mortgage, car loan or credit card debt will be unavailable to throw the first stone, regardless of the interest rate (Psalm 15:1-5, Jeremiah 15:10).Graven images of other gods are an abomination (Deut 7:25). Thus the Happy Buddha on my dresser and my postcards of the Great Buddha at Kamakura would excuse me from taking the lead in rock throwing, if I hadn't already fallen by the wayside.My personal favorite abomination is wearing blended fabrics. Deuteronomy 22:11 forbids wearing a material made of wool and linen, but Leviticus 19:19 says it's an abomination to wear any blended material, period. Hence a woman in a man's buttondown can be doubly abominable if it's a no-iron, easy care blend of cotton and polyester. Than there are going to be a lot of people going to hell....

oh now who's being silly?just because some abominations are goofy doesn't mean that the ones I care about are

Hey thor.I've purposely stayed out of this thread, not because I don't have my opinion on the matter but simply because I don't want to get in Eddie's way since he obviously is very passionate about the subject.I simply have one question that I hope you can answer. I'm not going to attack you or call you a homophobe. I will directly address your view, that homosexuality is ok but homosexual sex is not.How is gay sex morally wrong?

Originally Posted By: bobaliciousHey thor.I've purposely stayed out of this thread, not because I don't have my opinion on the matter but simply because I don't want to get in Eddie's way since he obviously is very passionate about the subject.I simply have one question that I hope you can answer. I'm not going to attack you or call you a homophobe. I will directly address your view, that homosexuality is ok but homosexual sex is not.How is gay sex morally wrong? It's an abomination in the eyes of God...says so in the Bible in several places (as if to drive the point home). Whether you want to accept it or not, the vast majority of what we refer to as morals come from a combination of our culture mixed with Biblical precident. Take a look at the Ten Commandments and think about it.

Originally Posted By: NtroducingMyselfThan there are going to be a lot of people going to hell.... I suggest you do some personal research of your own instead of taking something from somebody else at face value.

Originally Posted By: thorIt's an abomination in the eyes of God...says so in the Bible in several places (as if to drive the point home). Whether you want to accept it or not, the vast majority of what we refer to as morals come from a combination of our culture mixed with Biblical precident. Take a look at the Ten Commandments and think about it. Well the first five commandments are pretty much ignored by the majority of people, while the remaining five are usually very strictly followed. Ever wonder why? The last five commandments are useful to society; murder, theft, adultery, lying - these all have victims and nobody likes being a victim. It hurts society to have victims and inequality, which is why society is such a big fan of justice. And these last five commandments were not new ideas, they have been around for a long time. The Bible simply had them written down as the word of God.So the abominations from the Bible that exist today as morals are the ones that actually benefit society. Eating shellfish is not bad for society, so its been ignored by all but the most religious. As has wearing mixed-thread clothing.So unless you can explain why homosexual sex is bad for society, without use of the Bible, then it might as well be added to the list of useless abominations along with the crabs and the polyfibres.

Originally Posted By: bobalicious

Originally Posted By: thor

It's an abomination in the eyes of God...says so in the Bible in several places (as if to drive the point home). Whether you want to accept it or not, the vast majority of what we refer to as morals come from a combination of our culture mixed with Biblical precident. Take a look at the Ten Commandments and think about it.

Well the first five commandments are pretty much ignored by the majority of people, while the remaining five are usually very strictly followed. Ever wonder why?

The last five commandments are useful to society; murder, theft, adultery, lying - these all have victims and nobody likes being a victim. It hurts society to have victims and inequality, which is why society is such a big fan of justice. And these last five commandments were not new ideas, they have been around for a long time. The Bible simply had them written down as the word of God.

So the abominations from the Bible that exist today as morals are the ones that actually benefit society. Eating shellfish is not bad for society, so its been ignored by all but the most religious. As has wearing mixed-thread clothing.

So unless you can explain why homosexual sex is bad for society, without use of the Bible, then it might as well be added to the list of useless abominations along with the crabs and the polyfibres.

It's not up to me to explain anything. Regardless of how/why you think the Bible was written, it's extremely arrogant to think that you, one person, has more/better knowledge about what is/isn't good for society. So placing yourself in the position of judge as to what is and isn't acceptable behavior is laughable, at best. I defer to the Bible. You can play at God all you like...I won't be taking what you say as gospel. :wink:

History is replete with examples of men taking matters into their own hands...convinced that they can do a better job of saying what is/isn't good for society. Instead of a list of useful morals, they end up with a list that's incomplete...some ommitted because they think they should be allowed to do what they want, regardless of potential consequences (that they conveniently turns a blind eye to). Sound familiar? Society then spirals down and falls apart. Every time. Man's desire to follow his carnal side always wins out over all other concerns unless he is guided by an external set of rules...ones he cannot change, and cannot challenge on the basis of them being written by other men that he can assume, at will, are no smarter than he is.