You know that almost porn shows that come on late nights on the paid channels like Max and Showtime...Even though they don't show the actual penetration or the genitals of the people involved, don't you think they are really having sex...or are they faking it? Is there actual penetration and/or oral that is actually taking place?I'm thinking it may be hard to fake that, especially the penetration, but I know they are actors, some are not so great of actors/actresses though.What is your opinion?
-
Soft core Porn
-
It's fake. Even hardcore porno stars ex: Jenna Jones, can fake it.
-
Quote:What is your opinion? don't women fake it all the time...........sorry...sorry.. i'm just joking don't hit me!i don't know... but there is this new commercial out and it’s about some exercise thing for women’s tits... the whole commercial is just focused on cleavage and they actually move... that commercial...urggg...makes jabba jump up....sorry i know that’s way off topic hummm i been thinkign and maybe... it's both. if they don't show penetration it could be cuz it's fake and if / when they do it could be acualy doing it..... i don't know. I swear the shit i have seen looked so so real. but then it wasn't soft porn eihter.
-
I watched IndiePlex one time, and I was watching a documentary called "Sex in Cinema" or something like that. They mentioned that (believe it or not), some foreign movies (not from the USA) have real sex in them. I'm not making this up!
-
Yeah, there is nothing wrong with real sex in movies. As long as the sex is not intended to arouse, then its not porn. 9 Songs is a favourite movie of mine, full on sex, you see everything but the censors decided that it wasn't porn because the movie actually had a message.And its not just European movies, check out Lie With Me, a Canadian film with explicit sex.Its called art, people!
-
If it really isn't happening, penetration, you would think that the actors/actresses would get sexually frustrated sometimes with all the licking and kissing on the tops of thier bodies and all the real nakedness around them. Man, you know you would want to get touched with all the arousal going on, then having to fake it, on top of that. You think that the cunnilingus is totally fake too, would most likely if you all think/know that the penetration is faked.Some of those girls have got to be getting licked some of the time, maybe... ?
-
It's fake. Even hardcore porno stars ex: Jenna Jones, can fake it.
True, but thats the extent ofher acting abilities, is faking having a good time. Outside of that (and even at that shes not real good) she isnt qualified to be in a commercial for fucking raisin nut bars with no speaking parts.
-
If the actors consent to it and like eachother, there might be *unscripted* sex under the covers, but usually the director doesn't know this is going on. Most of the time, the dude's dick is taped to his leg or his undercarriage.
-
Originally Posted By: Sexpert... Most of the time, the dude's dick is taped to his leg or his undercarriage. That would be so uncomfortable, don't ya think, especially when it starts to get hard. Crazy stuff...
-
They probably are in pain, but they're actors.
-
Some movies are made to be fake while some just cut out the actual act and replay up to that point many times. One that involve porn stars are probably real but won't show anything.
-
ughhhh thats movie....when i worked at the movie store, a "mother" called and reserved that movie. anyways, a minor came in and claimed he was getting it for his mother, so my coworker called his mom to make sure, and she FLIPPED out. got him on the phone and he was like "aww mom come on ive watched it before" WTF!! lmao..
-
Which one are we talking about?
-
Mother of all Movies!!
-
Lol ouch ><
-
lol, the "lie with me" one... shudders
-
Yeah, personally I wasn't too big of a fan of it, but at the same time there were parts of the story that I did like.
-
Shortbus was another flick that had actual sex in it. Penetration, masturbation, orgasm...yep it was real. It it was actually a legit John Cameron Mitchell flick.However, I honestly believe the film didn't need all that to be what it was trying to be...if I understood what it was trying to be. I think that too many directors who make that choice are doing it for shock value, or as a "screw morals" statement. If I could see one where I honestly believed the explicit sex was integral to the movie, I would be surprised.
-
Well with 9 Songs, to my knowledge, the explicit sex wasn't meant as a "screw morals" kind of thing. It was meant as a commentary on how the "modern" view of sex is stuck in the early 20th century, sex-is-wrong-and-you-should-be-ashamed-of-yourself-for-even-thinking-about-it mindset.It doesn't glorify the sex, it portrays it in its true nature. Its not him pummelling the ass off of her, its slow, its boring and its honest.
-
I didn't see it that way. I started to say I saw it as distracting, but then again, there was really nothing there to distract from. I though the whole film was a boring bust.But, I do get that there is a difference between films like '9 Songs' and 'Romance', in which it could possibly - on some planet - be argued that the sex is about something, and films like 'Shortbus' and 'Caligula' in which it seems the thought process was "here's the story we wanna tell. And oh, yeah, let's stick in some porn to make it hot and controversial".
