If you had kids...

---

well if I had it to do over again my kids wouldnt be cut, and I wouldnt have been either. Im sure ther are benifits to fnot being cut and I think they outwieght the minor convience of being cut. i just couldnt think of any advantages to intercourse that arose from having the skin. I maynot be the bet lay of the land, but Iv never had any troubles or complaints either.

That's why any information posted here should be taken with a big grain of salt, especially if it's just a bare opinion, with no references or other backup. This place is not the CDC.

I mentioned before that there is less chaffing now (having restored some foreskin), but I've also read somewhere that the foreskin acts as a seal to keep lubrication and semen in the vaginal canal. I'm still looking for that source of that info.

Yeah, something to the effect that, on the out stroke, a foreskin slips forward, so the penis doesn't carry away lubrication.

what the fuck? sloppy seconds??god after all the safe sex talks around here we are now promoting sharing some skank, filling her up with goo, and your buddy pulling yours out when he takes is turn and refilling her with his.I suppose so long as you dot go seond its all good, no fuss, and no baby.

No he wouldnt.shall I tell you why?Because men are fucking pigs anyways, they will fuck anything so long as they get to fuck something.A irl would have to be a skank to go for that, but a man only has to be a man, because hes a fucking pig anyways.

Input from an uncut guy would be useful, but I'm pretty sure foreskin does not force fluid out of the vaginal canal.http://www.circumstitions.com/Functions.htmlhttp://www.compleatmother.com/arch_circ.htm

I'm not a pig, I'm a meterosexual

In reply to:Your father chose to leave you uncircumcised (im assuming, if not, my mistake) No, I'm circumcised like you are. Was cut at birth - parents decision. The topic came up with my mother somehow a few years back, and she said she regrets having me circumcised knowing what she knows now (she read an article in the newspaper about how its not necessary, no longer endorsed by the American medical association, loss of sensitivity, etc.) She said the only reason she had me circumcised was because it 'was the thing to do - everyone had their baby boys circumcised at the time, and nobody questioned why.' In reply to: Well, as you said, give your son the choice to get circumcised. I'll let my son make his own choice to decide whether or not restoring his foreskin is in his best interest. It's a two way road. No, it's not a two way road for the simple fact that you cannot restore a foreskin the way it originally was. If you could, I would agree with you. But you cannot restore a foreskin. All you can do is restore a facsimile of one. Guys you read about who have 'restored' do not have a fully functioning foreskin - it is simply stretched out extra shaft skin and some remnants of the inner foreskin stretched out. Key components of the original foreskin that can never be restored and are permanently removed during circumcision are: the frenar band, the frenulum, and most of the mucosal tissue of the inner foreskin. If you don't know what these things are, then you don't know enough about the foreskin to make an educated decision about circumcising your son. Don't feel bad - most parents who circumcise their sons don't make educated decisions, and don't know much about the foreskin. The key issue here is these components: the frenar band and the frenulum, have LOADS of nerve endings in them, and they are pleasure points of the intact penis. This isn't speculation - it is medical fact. Once the frenulum and frenar band are cut off during circumcision, much of their nerve endings are cut off with them, and cannot be restored. In reply to:I'd rather the surgery be performed as an infant, and the memory of the pain gone at a mature age, than preform the surgery in the later years of a boys life, so they may experience the pain and uncomfortable state their penis is in.Understandable, however, infants can definitely feel pain, and if you read the posts of guys here who were circumcised as teens or adults, most report that with anesthesia, it wasn't a very painful process, and it was not traumatic.

Thanks for your clarification on the glans penis; but, I still disagree for the following reasons;1) I'm not familiar with any point of the human evolution where females romped with different men, one after another, in one session as a way of reproducing. Also, even women who live in primitive societies that walk around naked don't have junk (semen, dirt, sticks, etc.) sitting in the vaginal canal waiting to be removed by a glans penis. Therefore, it would not logically make sense for pulling semen out of the vaginal canal to be a function of the glans penis.2) One very practical function of the foreskin is to hold fluid in the vaginal canal, that's no secret, and if that is the case why would two parts of the same organ have opposing functions (I think you said that). It is not my intent to include websites as a source of absolute information, only as support to my point. No offense, but I'd put more stock in a New York Times article than a talk show.3) After a man ejaculates the penis does soften considerably, but not totally. It is still in an aroused flaccid state and the extra skin continues to prevent leakage (fact). On a personal note, I also believe this is why women 'need' to be held afterwards, as it allows the needed time for the sperm to start their travel.4) From the look of a glads penis, I would tend to think that the function of the shape serves to hold back the foreskin, not so much a cleaning scoop. After all, it does hold back the foreskin. I can't speak on the cleaning properties, as all of the women I've been with self-clean. http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htmhttp://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/fleiss3/

Based on testicle size, it appears that humans are moderately promiscuous, between chimpanzees (very promisicuous females) and great apes (very monogamous females). It makes sense that there would be mechanisms in the male's physiology to battle other males' sperm. In fact, some sperm in a male's ejaculate serve to battle other men's sperm encountered in the female reproductive system.(Chimpanzees have relatively huge balls so they can produce enough sperm to have a chance of impregnating a typical female, who likely has and will be with other males.)

Absolutely, and would probably have to go out of my way to have it done here (in the UK). I would even pay for it.

No I wouldn't, I would let my child make that decision when he was older, unless it became medically necessary to have it done

I would not circumsize them

Circumcision, in my opinion, is a sick depraved act on the behalf of the medical community using higiene as an excuse, If you can potty train your kid, you can teach him to clean himself right.

I really regret my parents allowing me to be circumsized, so ill let my child make the descision when he's older

No I wouldn't, I would let my child make that decision when he was older, unless it became medically necessary to have it done I agree with Trevor, I would only have circumcised if it was medically necessary to. Its their penis, so it should be their choice.

As i am circumsised, if the mother agreed, i would have it cut, prolyl just cause i am and i like it, less complicated